Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760733›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

International cross-cultural development and field testing of the primary care practice questionnaire for the PaRIS survey (PaRIS-PCPQ).

Janika Bloemeke-Cammin, Oliver Groene, Marta Ballester, Frederico Guanais, Peter Groenewegen, Candan Kendir, Ian Porter, Amun Rehsi, Mieke Rijken, Peter Spreeuwenberg and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Janika Bloemeke-Cammin *Department Research & Innovation, OptiMedis AG, Burchardstraße 17, 20095, Hamburg, Germany.
Oliver Groene *Department Research & Innovation, OptiMedis AG, Burchardstraße 17, 20095, Hamburg, Germany. o.groene@optimedis.de.
Marta BallesterAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Frederico GuanaisOECD, Health Division, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Paris, France.
Peter GroenewegenNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Candan KendirOECD, Health Division, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Paris, France.
Ian PorterHealth Services & Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Amun RehsiIpsos, London, UK.
Mieke RijkenNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Peter SpreeuwenbergNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Rosa SuñolAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Maria ValderasHealth Services & Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Rachel WilliamsIpsos, London, UK.
Michael van den BergOECD, Health Division, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PaRIS survey, an initiative of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), aims to assess health systems performance in delivering primary care by measuring the care experiences and outcomes of people over 45 who used primary care services in the past six months. In addition, linked data from primary care practices are collected to analyse how the organisation of primary care practices and their care processes impact care experiences and outcomes. This article describes the development and validation of the primary care practice questionnaire for the PaRIS survey, the PaRIS-PCPQ.

methodThe PaRIS-PCPQ was developed based on domains of primary care practice and professional characteristics included in the PaRIS conceptual framework. Questionnaire development was conducted in four phases: (1) a multi-step consensus-based development of the source questionnaire, (2) translation of the English source questionnaire into 17 languages, (3) cross-national cognitive testing with primary care professionals in participating countries, and (4) cross-national field-testing.

results70 items were selected from 7 existing questionnaires on primary care characteristics, of which 49 were included in a first draft. Feedback from stakeholders resulted in a modified 34-item version (practice profile, care coordination, chronic care management, patient follow-up, and respondent characteristics) designed to be completed online by medical or non-medical staff working in a primary care practice. Cognitive testing led to changes in the source questionnaire as well as to country specific localisations. The resulting 32-item questionnaire was piloted in an online survey and field test. Data from 540 primary care practices from 17 countries were collected and analysed. Final revision resulted in a 34-item questionnaire.

conclusionsThe cross-national development of a primary care practice questionnaire is challenging due to the differences in care delivery systems. Rigorous translation and cognitive testing as well as stakeholder engagement helped to overcome most challenges. The PaRIS-PCPQ will be used to assess how key characteristics of primary care practices relate to the care experiences and outcomes of people living with chronic conditions. As such, policymakers and care providers will be informed about the performance of primary care from the patient's perspective.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChronic carePaRIS surveyPatient-centred carePatient-reported experience measuresPatient-reported outcome measuresPeople-centred healthcare systemPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID38760733
PMCPMC11100105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.