Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760718›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Identification of patients' smoking status using an explainable AI approach: a Danish electronic health records case study.

Ali Ebrahimi, Margrethe Bang Høstgaard Henriksen, Claus Lohman Brasen, Ole Hilberg, Torben Frøstrup Hansen, Lars Henrik Jensen, Abdolrahman Peimankar, Uffe Kock Wiil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The doctor will polygraph you now.npj health systems · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ali Ebrahimi *SDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, 5230, Denmark. aleb@mmmi.sdu.dk.
Margrethe Bang Høstgaard Henriksen *Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, 7100, Denmark.
Claus Lohman BrasenDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, 7100, Denmark.
Ole HilbergInstitute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Torben Frøstrup HansenDepartment of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, 7100, Denmark.
Lars Henrik JensenDepartment of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, 7100, Denmark.
Abdolrahman PeimankarSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, 5230, Denmark.
Uffe Kock WiilSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, 5230, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking is a critical risk factor responsible for over eight million annual deaths worldwide. It is essential to obtain information on smoking habits to advance research and implement preventive measures such as screening of high-risk individuals. In most countries, including Denmark, smoking habits are not systematically recorded and at best documented within unstructured free-text segments of electronic health records (EHRs). This would require researchers and clinicians to manually navigate through extensive amounts of unstructured data, which is one of the main reasons that smoking habits are rarely integrated into larger studies. Our aim is to develop machine learning models to classify patients' smoking status from their EHRs.

methodsThis study proposes an efficient natural language processing (NLP) pipeline capable of classifying patients' smoking status and providing explanations for the decisions. The proposed NLP pipeline comprises four distinct components, which are; (1) considering preprocessing techniques to address abbreviations, punctuation, and other textual irregularities, (2) four cutting-edge feature extraction techniques, i.e. Embedding, BERT, Word2Vec, and Count Vectorizer, employed to extract the optimal features, (3) utilization of a Stacking-based Ensemble (SE) model and a Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network (CNN-LSTM) for the identification of smoking status, and (4) application of a local interpretable model-agnostic explanation to explain the decisions rendered by the detection models. The EHRs of 23,132 patients with suspected lung cancer were collected from the Region of Southern Denmark during the period 1/1/2009-31/12/2018. A medical professional annotated the data into 'Smoker' and 'Non-Smoker' with further classifications as 'Active-Smoker', 'Former-Smoker', and 'Never-Smoker'. Subsequently, the annotated dataset was used for the development of binary and multiclass classification models. An extensive comparison was conducted of the detection performance across various model architectures.

resultsThe results of experimental validation confirm the consistency among the models. However, for binary classification, BERT method with CNN-LSTM architecture outperformed other models by achieving precision, recall, and F1-scores between 97% and 99% for both Never-Smokers and Active-Smokers. In multiclass classification, the Embedding technique with CNN-LSTM architecture yielded the most favorable results in class-specific evaluations, with equal performance measures of 97% for Never-Smoker and measures in the range of 86 to 89% for Active-Smoker and 91-92% for Never-Smoker.

conclusionOur proposed NLP pipeline achieved a high level of classification performance. In addition, we presented the explanation of the decision made by the best performing detection model. Future work will expand the model's capabilities to analyze longer notes and a broader range of categories to maximize its utility in further research and screening applications.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingSmokingDenmarkFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerCNNDeep learningElectronic health recordExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)LSTMNatural language processingSmoking statusStacking-based ensembleText classification

Identifiers

PMID38760718
PMCPMC11100078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.