Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760595›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2024

Therapy-Related Satisfaction and Quality of Life for Japanese People with Diabetes Using Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs: A Web-Based Survey.

Hitoshi Ishii, Yasutaka Maeda, Manaka Sato, Zhihong Cai, Makoto Imori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hitoshi IshiiDepartment of Doctor-Patient Relationships, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6214-0557
Yasutaka MaedaPatient Author; Clinic Masae Minami, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3259-5622
Manaka SatoJapan Drug Development & Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Lilly Plaza One Bldg., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan. sato_manaka@lilly.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7000-4769
Zhihong CaiJapan Drug Development & Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Lilly Plaza One Bldg., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3431-197X
Makoto ImoriJapan Drug Development & Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Lilly Plaza One Bldg., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with diabetes require insulin to regulate blood glucose (BG); rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAIA) represent one approach for BG management. New fast-acting RAIA administered at the start of a meal suppress postprandial BG better than conventional RAIA. New RAIA are expected to confer higher treatment satisfaction and improved quality of life (QOL) than conventional RAIA.

methodsThis cross-sectional, web-based survey in Japan (November 2022) included people with diabetes (type 1/2), aged ≥ 18 years, registered in the Rakuten Insight Diabetes Panel, using new and/or conventional RAIA. RAIA-specific satisfaction was evaluated by questions on RAIA use (scores: 1 [not at all satisfied]; 7 [very satisfied]) and QOL by the Diabetes Therapy-Related (DTR)-QOL questionnaire (scores: 0-100, 100 = best) for the whole population (primary endpoint) and for new versus conventional RAIA users (secondary endpoint). Multiple regression models were used to compare new versus conventional RAIA users.

resultsThe analysis population comprised 217 people with diabetes (new RAIA, n = 109; conventional RAIA, n = 108). Mean (standard deviation) RAIA-specific satisfaction scores ranged from 5.1 (1.2) to 5.4 (1.2); DTR-QOL total score was 51.6 (20.4). RAIA satisfaction scores were numerically higher for new versus conventional RAIA users; no difference in DTR-QOL total score was observed. DTR-QOL satisfaction with treatment domain score was significantly higher in new versus conventional RAIA users (least squares mean difference [standard error]: 7.3 [3.1]; 95% confidence interval: 1.2, 13.4; P = 0.0197). RAIA-specific satisfaction was higher among patients who discussed BG sufficiently with their doctor versus those who did not.

conclusionsNew RAIA users have greater treatment satisfaction than conventional RAIA users. QOL was similar among new and conventional RAIA users, except for satisfaction with treatment, which was significantly higher among new RAIA users. Detailed explanations from the doctor to the person with diabetes about the relationship between new RAIA and BG status are essential. A graphical plain language summary is available with this article.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusDiabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life questionnaireInsulin aspartInsulin glulisineInsulin lisproJapanQuality of lifeRapid-acting insulin analogTreatment satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38760595
PMCPMC11211310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.