Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760524›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024

Upstroke time is a more useful marker of atherosclerosis than percentage of mean arterial pressure for detecting coronary artery disease in subjects with a normal ankle-brachial index.

Tatsuya Maruhashi, Masato Kajikawa, Shinji Kishimoto, Takayuki Yamaji, Takahiro Harada, Yu Hashimoto, Aya Mizobuchi, Shunsuke Tanigawa, Farina Mohamad Yusoff, Yukiko Nakano and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Current topic of vascular function in hypertension in 2023-2024.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tatsuya MaruhashiDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Division of Radiation Medical Science, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan.
Masato KajikawaDivision of Regeneration and Medicine, Medical Center for Translational and Clinical Research, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Shinji KishimotoDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Division of Radiation Medical Science, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan.
Takayuki YamajiDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Division of Radiation Medical Science, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan.
Takahiro HaradaDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Division of Radiation Medical Science, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan.
Yu HashimotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Aya MizobuchiDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Division of Radiation Medical Science, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan.
Shunsuke TanigawaDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Division of Radiation Medical Science, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan.
Farina Mohamad YusoffDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Division of Radiation Medical Science, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan.
Yukiko NakanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Kazuaki ChayamaDepartment of Medicine and Molecular Science, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Ayumu NakashimaDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Chikara GotoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of general Rehabilitation, Hiroshima International University, 555-36, Kurosegakuendai, Higashihiroshima, 739-2695, Japan.
Yukihito HigashiDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Division of Radiation Medical Science, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan. yhigashi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upstroke time (UT) and percentage of mean arterial pressure (%MAP) at the ankle have been shown to serve as atherosclerotic markers. The purpose of this study was to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of UT with that of %MAP for clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) in subjects with a normal ankle-brachial index (ABI) in both legs. We measured UT and %MAP in 1953 subjects with a normal ABI. The optimal cutoff values of UT and %MAP derived from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to diagnose CAD were 148 ms and 40.4%, respectively. Multivariable analyses revealed that both UT ≥ 148 ms (odds ratio [OR], 2.72; p < 0.001) and %MAP ≥ 40.4% (OR, 1.28; p = 0.003) were significantly associated with CAD. When the subjects were divided into four groups according to the cutoff values of UT and %MAP, there was no significant difference in the risk of CAD between subjects with UT ≥ 148 ms and %MAP < 40.4% and those with UT ≥ 148 ms and %MAP ≥ 40.4% (OR, 1.45; p = 0.09). ROC curve analyses revealed that the area under the curve value of UT was significantly higher than that of %MAP (0.69 vs. 0.53, p < 0.001). The addition of UT to traditional risk factors significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy for CAD (0.82 to 0.84, p = 0.004), whereas the addition of %MAP to traditional risk factors did not improve the diagnostic accuracy for CAD (0.82 to 0.82, p = 0.84). UT is more useful than %MAP for identifying individuals with CAD among those with a normal ABI.

Indexed as

Ankle Brachial IndexArterial PressureAtherosclerosisCoronary Artery DiseaseAdultAgedBlood PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveAnkle-brachial indexCardiovascular riskPercentage of mean arterial pressureUpstroke time

Identifiers

PMID38760524
PMCPMC11298401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.