Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760523›Full record

SynthesisHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024

Effects of acute carotid baroreceptor stimulation on sympathetic nerve traffic in resistant and uncontrolled hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Annalisa Biffi, Fosca Quarti-Trevano, Jennifer Vanoli, Raffaella Dell'Oro, Giovanni Corrao, Giuseppe Mancia, Guido Grassi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annalisa Biffi *Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Fosca Quarti-Trevano *Clinica Medica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Jennifer VanoliClinica Medica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Raffaella Dell'OroClinica Medica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Giovanni CorraoDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Giuseppe ManciaClinica Medica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Guido GrassiClinica Medica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy. guido.grassi@unimib.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In resistant hypertensive patients acute carotid baroreflex stimulation is associated with a blood pressure (BP) reduction, believed to be mediated by a central sympathoinhbition.The evidence for this sympathomodulatory effect is limited, however. This meta-analysis is the first to examine the sympathomodulatory effects of acute carotid baroreflex stimulation in drug-resistant and uncontrolled hypertension, based on the results of microneurographic studies. The analysis included 3 studies assessing muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and examining 41 resistant uncontrolled hypertensives. The evaluation included assessment of the relationships between MSNA and clinic heart rate and BP changes associated with the procedure. Carotid baroreflex stimulation induced an acute reduction in clinic systolic and diastolic BP which achieved statistical significance for the former variable only [systolic BP: -19.98 mmHg (90% CI, -30.52, -9.43), P < 0.002], [diastolic BP: -5.49 mmHg (90% CI, -11.38, 0.39), P = NS]. These BP changes were accompanied by a significant MSNA reduction [-4.28 bursts/min (90% CI, -8.62, 0.06), P < 0.07], and by a significant heart rate decrease [-3.65 beats/min (90% CI, -5.49, -1.81), P < 0.001]. No significant relationship was detected beween the MSNA, systolic and diastolic BP changes induced by the procedure, this being the case also for heart rate. Our data show that the acute BP lowering responses to carotid baroreflex stimulation, although associated with a significant MSNA reduction, are not quantitatively related to the sympathomoderating effects of the procedure. This may suggest that these BP effects depend only in part on central sympathoinhibition, at least in the acute phase following the intervention.

Indexed as

BaroreflexBlood PressureHypertensionPressoreceptorsSympathetic Nervous SystemCarotid SinusElectric Stimulation TherapyHeart RateHumansBlood pressureCarotid baroreceptor stimulationHeart rateMeta-analysisSympathetic nerve traffic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.