Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760506›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

A domain knowledge-based interpretable deep learning system for improving clinical breast ultrasound diagnosis.

Lin Yan, Zhiying Liang, Hao Zhang, Gaosong Zhang, Weiwei Zheng, Chunguang Han, Dongsheng Yu, Hanqi Zhang, Xinxin Xie, Chang Liu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Beyond black-box AI: Interpretable hybrid systems for dementia care.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lin Yan *School of Mathematics, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5507-8989
Zhiying Liang *School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Hao Zhang *Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Gaosong ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Weiwei ZhengDepartment of Ultrasound, Xuancheng People's Hospital, Xuancheng, China.
Chunguang HanDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-3795
Dongsheng YuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Hanqi ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xinxin XieDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chang LiuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Wenxin ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Hui ZhengDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Jing PeiDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. peijing@ahmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2340-0616
Dinggang ShenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China. dgshen@shanghaitech.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7934-5698
Xuejun QianSchool of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China. qianxj@shanghaitech.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3634-8757

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82371993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThough deep learning has consistently demonstrated advantages in the automatic interpretation of breast ultrasound images, its black-box nature hinders potential interactions with radiologists, posing obstacles for clinical deployment.

methodsWe proposed a domain knowledge-based interpretable deep learning system for improving breast cancer risk prediction via paired multimodal ultrasound images. The deep learning system was developed on 4320 multimodal breast ultrasound images of 1440 biopsy-confirmed lesions from 1348 prospectively enrolled patients across two hospitals between August 2019 and December 2022. The lesions were allocated to 70% training cohort, 10% validation cohort, and 20% test cohort based on case recruitment date.

resultsHere, we show that the interpretable deep learning system can predict breast cancer risk as accurately as experienced radiologists, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.902 (95% confidence interval = 0.882 - 0.921), sensitivity of 75.2%, and specificity of 91.8% on the test cohort. With the aid of the deep learning system, particularly its inherent explainable features, junior radiologists tend to achieve better clinical outcomes, while senior radiologists experience increased confidence levels. Multimodal ultrasound images augmented with domain knowledge-based reasoning cues enable an effective human-machine collaboration at a high level of prediction performance.

conclusionsSuch a clinically applicable deep learning system may be incorporated into future breast cancer screening and support assisted or second-read workflows.

Identifiers

PMID38760506
PMCPMC11101659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.