Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760502›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2024

Enrichment of a subset of Neanderthal polymorphisms in autistic probands and siblings.

Rini Pauly, Layla Johnson, F Alex Feltus, Emily L Casanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rini PaulyBiomedical Data Science and Informatics Program, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Layla JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University, New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA.
F Alex FeltusBiomedical Data Science and Informatics Program, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2123-6114
Emily L CasanovaDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University, New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA. elcasano@loyno.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5129-6698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homo sapiens and Neanderthals underwent hybridization during the Middle/Upper Paleolithic age, culminating in retention of small amounts of Neanderthal-derived DNA in the modern human genome. In the current study, we address the potential roles Neanderthal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) may be playing in autism susceptibility in samples of black non-Hispanic, white Hispanic, and white non-Hispanic people using data from the Simons Foundation Powering Autism Research (SPARK), Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), and 1000 Genomes (1000G) databases. We have discovered that rare variants are significantly enriched in autistic probands compared to race-matched controls. In addition, we have identified 25 rare and common SNPs that are significantly enriched in autism on different ethnic backgrounds, some of which show significant clinical associations. We have also identified other SNPs that share more specific genotype-phenotype correlations but which are not necessarily enriched in autism and yet may nevertheless play roles in comorbid phenotype expression (e.g., intellectual disability, epilepsy, and language regression). These results strongly suggest Neanderthal-derived DNA is playing a significant role in autism susceptibility across major populations in the United States.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseNeanderthalsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSiblingsAnimalsBlack or African AmericanFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenome, HumanGenotypeHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleUnited StatesWhite

Identifiers

PMID38760502
PMCPMC11541192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.