ArticleScientific reports2024
Screening practices and risk assessment for maculopathy in pentosan polysulfate users across different exposure levels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone use and glaucoma risk: pharmacovigilance analysis and nationwide cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Nationwide health claims analysis of phenothiazine-associated retinopathy risk in chlorpromazine and perphenazine users.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Real-World Practices of Pentosan Polysulfate Maculopathy Screening in Various Clinical Settings and Practice-Associated Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Real-World Research on Retinal Diseases Using Health Claims Database: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this population-based cohort study, we investigated screening practices for maculopathy and incidences of specific macular/retinal conditions in pentosan polysulfate (PPS) users and assessed the relationship between these outcomes and drug exposure levels. Using a health claims database that covers approximately 50 million Koreans, we identified 138,593 individuals who were prescribed PPS between 2010 and 2021. For the 133,762 PPS users who initiated therapy between 2012 and 2021, the cumulative PPS dose for each participant was evaluated, and based on their cumulative PPS dose, patients were categorized into the high-risk (≥ 500 g), low-risk (50-500 g), and minimal exposure (< 50 g) groups. We analyzed the performance and methods of these examination methods used between 2018 and 2021 and compared them among cumulative dose groups to determine whether high-risk users underwent maculopathy screening more frequently or appropriately. We assessed the cumulative incidence of overall macular degeneration and maculopathy excluding common macular diseases following PPS therapy initiation. Most PPS users (99.7%) received a cumulative PPS dose < 500 g and the high- and low-risk groups comprised 445 (0.3%) and 22,185 (16.6%) patients, respectively. During the study period, monitoring examinations were conducted in 52.6% and 49.4% of high- and low-risk patients, respectively, revealing no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.156). No significant differences were observed in the annual percentages of patients receiving ophthalmic examinations between the high- and low-risk groups (all P > 0.05). The cumulative incidences of overall macular degeneration and maculopathy excluding common macular diseases in high-risk users were 19.3% and 9.0%, respectively, which were significantly different from those of low-risk users (both P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed significantly higher risks of maculopathy excluding common macular diseases in the low- (Hazard ratio [HR] of 1.55 [95% CI 1.13-2.12]) and high-risk groups (HR of 1.66 [95% CI 1.22-2.27]) compared to the minimal exposure group. Our findings suggest a need for increased emphasis on PPS maculopathy screening in high-risk patients, highlighting raising awareness regarding exposure-dependent risks and the establishment of screening guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.