ArticleNature communications2024
High-throughput mechanical phenotyping and transcriptomics of single cells.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mechanobiological landscape of muscle stem cells.Skeletal muscle · 2026Review
- Deep visual proteomics uncovers nociceptor diversity and pain targets.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Inhibiting Effect of Inner Potential on Electroporation of Phospholipid Membranes Induced by Ionic Electrophoresis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Blood Mechanical Intelligence: From Force Sensing to Precision Mechanomedicine.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Review
- Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanism paradoxes to precision therapeutics.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Engineering next-generation microfluidic technologies for single-cell phenomics.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Advanced Microarrays as Heterogeneous Force-Remodeling Coordinator to Orchestrate Nuclear Configuration and Force-Sensing Mechanotransduction in Stem Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Mechanical signatures in cancer metastasis.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2025Review
- Bidirectional Modulation on Electroporation Induced by Membrane Tension Under the Electric Field.ACS omega · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The molecular system regulating cellular mechanical properties remains unexplored at single-cell resolution mainly due to a limited ability to combine mechanophenotyping with unbiased transcriptional screening. Here, we describe an electroporation-based lipid-bilayer assay for cell surface tension and transcriptomics (ELASTomics), a method in which oligonucleotide-labelled macromolecules are imported into cells via nanopore electroporation to assess the mechanical state of the cell surface and are enumerated by sequencing. ELASTomics can be readily integrated with existing single-cell sequencing approaches and enables the joint study of cell surface mechanics and underlying transcriptional regulation at an unprecedented resolution. We validate ELASTomics via analysis of cancer cell lines from various malignancies and show that the method can accurately identify cell types and assess cell surface tension. ELASTomics enables exploration of the relationships between cell surface tension, surface proteins, and transcripts along cell lineages differentiating from the haematopoietic progenitor cells of mice. We study the surface mechanics of cellular senescence and demonstrate that RRAD regulates cell surface tension in senescent TIG-1 cells. ELASTomics provides a unique opportunity to profile the mechanical and molecular phenotypes of single cells and can dissect the interplay among these in a range of biological contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.