ReviewSurgery2024
Sepsis in surgical patients: Personalized medicine in the future treatment of sepsis.
Review in Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the mechanism of polymorphonuclear neutrophils against sepsis based on immune model.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Curcumin regulates ferroptosis by activating α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor to improve sepsis-induced acute kidney injury.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Metabolic Reprogramming and Immune Metabolism in Sepsis: Targeting the PPAR Pathway for Personalized Therapeutic Approaches.PPAR research · 2026Review
- Identification of a novel and high affinity MIF inhibitorJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis results when a severe infection overwhelms the normal regulatory mechanisms of the immune system, resulting in a dysregulated host response characterized by new-onset organ failure. A wide range of infectious challenges can induce sepsis, resulting in an even wider range of maladaptive immune responses. This makes sepsis a syndromic diagnosis without a unifying, underlying molecular mechanism. The next step toward personalized medicine for sepsis is to resolve the heterogeneity across the universe of septic patients in order to establish pathobiologically homogenous sepsis "endotypes" that have uniformly defined changes in physiology and immunology. Defining the mechanisms of immune dysfunction within these endotypes will provide a roadmap for the application of immunomodulatory therapies for sepsis. This approach can drive in a paradigm shift in sepsis treatment, moving beyond supportive care and toward active efforts to restore normal immune function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.