ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024
Neurovascular Imaging with Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT: Preliminary Findings on Image-Quality Evaluation.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photon-counting detector CT for follow-up after TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma: effects of reconstruction kernel and sharpness.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT Angiography for Noninvasive Detection of Neurovascular In-Stent Restenosis.Stroke · 2026Article
- Photon-counting detector of the ophthalmic artery: impact of virtual monoenergetic levels, reconstruction kernel, and quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) on image quality.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Application of ultrasound biomicroscopy in ocular trauma caused by chestnut-burr spines.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Improved Computed Tomography Imaging Post-Flow Diverter Treatment Using a SOMATOM X.Cite Scanner.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
- Perimesencephalic non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: is there a need for repeat digital subtraction angiography?Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Ultra-high resolution CT angiography for the assessment of intracranial stents and flow diverters using photon counting detector CT.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2025Article
- Ultra-high-resolution imaging of intracranial flow diverters with photon counting CT: A comparative phantom study with flat-panel CT.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Photon-counting detector CTA to assess intracranial stents and flow diverters: an in vivo study with ultrahigh-resolution spectral reconstructions.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Visibility of Intracranial Perforating Arteries Using Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography (CT) Angiography.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Optimizing Photon-Counting Detector CT for Imaging Intracranial Aneurysms.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe first-generation photon-counting detector CT was recently introduced into clinical practice and represents a promising innovation in high-resolution CT imaging. The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality of ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT compared with energy-integrating detector CT and to explore different reconstruction kernel sharpness levels for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND
methodsTen patients with intracranial saccular aneurysms who had previously undergone conventional energy-integrating detector CT were prospectively enrolled. CT angiograms were acquired on a clinical dual-source photon-counting detector CT in ultra-high-resolution mode and reconstructed with 4 vascular kernels (Bv36, Bv40, Bv44, Bv48). Quantitative and qualitative image-quality parameters of the intracranial arteries were evaluated. For the quantitative analysis (image noise, SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio), ROIs were manually placed at standard anatomic intracranial and extracranial locations by 1 author. In addition, vessel border sharpness was evaluated quantitatively. For the qualitative analysis, 3 blinded neuroradiologists rated photon-counting detector CT and energy-integrating detector CT image quality for the evaluation of the intracranial vessels (ie, the aneurysms and 9 standard vascular branching locations) on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Additionally, readers independently selected their preferred kernel among the 4 kernels evaluated on photon-counting detector CT.
resultsIn terms of quantitative image quality, Bv48, the sharpest kernel, yielded increased image noise and decreased SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio parameters compared with Bv36, the smoothest kernel. Compared with energy-integrating detector CT, the Bv48 kernel offered better quantitative image quality for the evaluation of small intracranial vessels (
conclusionsUltra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT provides improved image quality for neurovascular imaging. Although the less sharp kernels provided superior SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio, the sharpest kernels delivered the best subjective image quality on photon-counting detector CT for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.