SynthesisBMJ military health2026
Fat intravasation, fat emboli and fat embolism syndrome in adult major trauma patients with intraosseous catheters: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ military health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Macroscopic Pulmonary Fat Embolism Secondary to Intraosseous Line Placement: A Case Report.Case reports in critical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntraosseous (IO) administration of medication, fluids and blood products is accepted practice for critically injured patients in whom intravenous access is not immediately available. However, there are concerns that high intramedullary pressures resulting from IO infusion may cause bone marrow intravasation and subsequent fat embolisation. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the existing evidence describing fat intravasation, fat embolism and fat embolism syndrome (FES) following IO infusion.
methodsA systematic search of CINAHL, MEDLINE and Embase was undertaken using the search terms "intraosseous", "fat embolism", "fat intravasation" and "fat embolism syndrome". Two authors independently screened abstracts and full texts, against eligibility criteria and assessed risk of bias. A grey literature search (including references) was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were: all human and animal studies reporting novel data on IO-associated fat emboli. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
results22 papers were identified from the search, with a further 5 found from reference lists. N=7 full papers met inclusion criteria. These papers were all translational animal studies. The overall risk of bias was high. Studies demonstrated that fat intravasation and fat embolisation are near universal after IO infusion, but of uncertain clinical significance. The initial IO flush appears to cause the highest intramedullary pressure and highest chance of fat intravasation and embolisation. No conclusions could be drawn on FES.
conclusionsIO catheters remain a useful intervention in the armamentarium of trauma clinicians. Although their use is widely accepted, there is a paucity of evidence investigating fat embolisation in IO infusions. Despite this, pulmonary fat emboli after IO infusion are very common. The existing data are of low quality with a high risk of bias. More research is needed to address this important subject. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023399333.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.