Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760051›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Patient and caregiver characteristics associated with differential use of primary care for children and young people in the UK: a scoping review.

Kevin Herbert, Lauren Herlitz, Jenny Woodman, Claire Powell, Stephen Morris

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sociodemographic disparities in primary care management of back pain in children and young people: a population-based cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kevin HerbertCambridge Research Methods Hub, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK kch28@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0009-0008-4354-7811
Lauren HerlitzPopulation, Policy and Practice Department, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2497-9041
Jenny WoodmanInstitute of Education, UCL Social Research Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9403-4177
Claire PowellPopulation, Policy and Practice Department, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6581-0165
Stephen MorrisCambridge Research Methods Hub, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-3563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically map evidence to answer the research question:

settingPrimary care. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English-language quantitative or mixed-methods studies published between 2012 and 2022. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science Social Sciences Citation Index, and grey literature.

results22 eligible studies were identified, covering general practice (n=14), dental health (n=4), child mental health (MN) services (n=3) and immunisation (n=1). Only eight studies (36%) controlled for variables associated with healthcare need (eg, age, birth weight and long-term conditions). In these, evidence of horizontal inequity in primary care use was reported for CYP living in deprived areas in England, with and without complex needs. Horizontal inequity was also identified in primary care MN referrals for CYP in England identifying as mixed-race, Asian or black ethnicity, compared with their white British peers. No evidence of horizontal inequity was observed, however, in primary care use for CYP in England exposed to parental depression, or for CYP children from low-income households in Scotland. Increasing CYP's age was associated with decreasing primary care use across included studies. No studies were found regarding CYP from Gypsy or Traveller communities, children in care, or those with disabilities or special educational needs.

conclusionsThere is evidence that socioeconomic factors impact on CYP's primary care use, in particular age, ethnicity and deprivation. However, better quality evidence is required to evaluate horizontal inequity in use and address knowledge gaps regarding primary care use for vulnerable CYP populations and the impact of policy and practice related 'supply side' of primary care.

Indexed as

CaregiversChild Health ServicesPrimary Health CareChildHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansUnited KingdomAdolescentHealth EquityHealth Services AccessibilityPrimary Care

Identifiers

PMID38760051
PMCPMC11103219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.