Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760041›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Anaesthetic and perioperative considerations for extrapleural pneumonectomy and extended pleurectomy/decortication: a scoping review protocol.

Sui Wah Sean Yip, Laurence Weinberg, Julian Gooi, Siven Sivenayagam, Tim G Coulson, Stephen A Barnett, Simon R Knight, Jarryd Ludski, Dong Kyu Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sui Wah Sean YipDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Laurence WeinbergDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia laurence.weinberg@austin.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7403-7680
Julian GooiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Siven SivenayagamDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Tim G CoulsonAnaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Stephen A BarnettDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Simon R KnightDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Jarryd LudskiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8076-6804
Dong Kyu LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea (the Republic of).ORCID 0000-0002-4068-2363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExtrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and extended pleurectomy/decortication (ePD) are surgical cytoreductive techniques aimed at achieving macroscopic resection in malignant pleural tumours such as pleural mesothelioma, non-mesothelioma pleural malignancies such as thymoma and sarcoma, and rarely for pleural tuberculosis, in a more limited fashion. Despite extensive studies on both surgical techniques and consequences, a significant knowledge gap remains regarding how best to approach the perioperative anaesthesia challenges for EPP and ePD.It is unknown if the risk stratification processes for such surgeries are standardised or what types of functional and dynamic cardiac and pulmonary tests are employed preoperatively to assist in the perioperative risk stratification. Further, it is unknown whether the types of anaesthesia and analgesia techniques employed, and the types of haemodynamic monitoring tools used, impact on outcomes. It is also unknown whether individualised haemodynamic protocols are used to guide the rational use of fluids, vasoactive drugs and inotropes.Finally, there is a dearth of evidence regarding how best to monitor these patients postoperatively or what the most effective enhanced recovery protocols are to best mitigate postoperative complications and accelerate hospital discharge. To increase our knowledge of the perioperative and anaesthetic treatment for patients undergoing EPP/ePD, this scoping review attempts to synthesise the literature and identify these knowledge gaps. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review Protocols methodology. Electronic databases, OVID Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, will be systematically searched for relevant literature corresponding to EPP or ePD and perioperative or anaesthetic management. Data will be analysed and summarised descriptively and organised according to the three perioperative stages: preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors in clinical care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required. The findings will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publications in scientific journals.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaPerioperative CarePleuraPneumonectomyHumansPleural NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsScoping Reviews as TopicAdult anaesthesiaAdult intensive & critical careAnaesthesia in oncologyPatient-Centered CareSURGERYThoracic medicine

Identifiers

PMID38760041
PMCPMC11103232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.