Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760030›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

What is current care for people with Long COVID in England? A qualitative interview study.

David Sunkersing, Mel Ramasawmy, Nisreen A Alwan, Donna Clutterbuck, Yi Mu, Kim Horstmanshof, Amitava Banerjee, Melissa Heightman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Psychosocial Aspects of the Lived Experience of Long COVID: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. 'What Do People With Long Covid Want From Healthcare Services?' A Qualitative Exploration From Lived Experience.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Vital yet Fragile: Informal Networks of Support Among Young People Navigating Long Covid.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David SunkersingInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK david.sunkersing@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9010-1435
Mel RamasawmyInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Nisreen A AlwanAcademic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Donna ClutterbuckAcademic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Yi MuInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Kim HorstmanshofUniversity College London, London, UK.
Amitava BanerjeeInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8741-3411
Melissa HeightmanUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate current care for people with Long COVID in England.

designIn-depth, semistructured interviews with people living with Long COVID and Long COVID healthcare professionals; data analysed using thematic analysis.

settingNational Health Service England post-COVID-19 services in six clinics from November 2022 to July 2023.

participants15 healthcare professionals and 21 people living with Long COVID currently attending or discharged (18 female; 3 male).

resultsHealth professionals and people with lived experience highlighted the multifaceted nature of Long COVID, including its varied symptoms, its impact on people's lives and the complexity involved in managing this condition. These impacts encompass physical, social, mental and environmental dimensions. People with Long COVID reported barriers in accessing primary care, as well as negative general practitioner consultations where they felt unheard or invalidated, though some positive interactions were also noted. Peer support or support systems proved highly valuable and beneficial for individuals, aiding their recovery and well-being. Post-COVID-19 services were viewed as spaces where overlooked voices found validation, offering more than medical expertise. Despite initial challenges, healthcare providers' increasing expertise in diagnosing and treating Long COVID has helped refine care approaches for this condition.

conclusionLong COVID care in England is not uniform across all locations. Effective communication, specialised expertise and comprehensive support systems are crucial. A patient-centred approach considering the unique complexities of Long COVID, including physical, mental health, social and environmental aspects is needed. Sustained access to post-COVID-19 services is imperative, with success dependent on offering continuous rehabilitation beyond rapid recovery, acknowledging the condition's enduring impacts and complexities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Qualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedEnglandFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePrimary Health CareState MedicineCOVID-19health servicespost-acute COVID-19 syndromepublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38760030
PMCPMC11107429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.