Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760029›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Strategies to address recruitment to a randomised trial of surgical and non-surgical treatment for cancer: results from a complex recruitment intervention within the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 (MARS 2) study.

Nicola Mills, Nicola Farrar, Barbara Warnes, Kate E Ashton, Rosie Harris, Chris A Rogers, Eric Lim, Daisy Elliott

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02040272 (Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02040272 naunknown statusnot on this map

Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2: a Multicentre Randomised Trial Comparing (Extended) Pleurectomy Decortication Versus no (Extended) Pleurectomy Decortication for Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (Mars 2).

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation TrustRan2015 to 2022Enrolled328ConditionsMesotheliomaArms(Extended) pleurectomy decortication
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicola MillsBristol Medical School, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK nicola.mills@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2960-2940
Nicola FarrarBristol Medical School, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.
Barbara WarnesBristol Medical School, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1326-0448
Kate E AshtonBristol Medical School, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9163-0512
Rosie HarrisBristol Medical School, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.
Chris A RogersBristol Medical School, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9624-2615
Eric LimAcademic Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Daisy ElliottBristol Medical School, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8143-9549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRecruiting to randomised trials is often challenging particularly when the intervention arms are markedly different. The Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared standard chemotherapy with or without (extended) pleurectomy decortication surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Anticipating recruitment difficulties, a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention was embedded in the main trial phase to unearth and address barriers. The trial achieved recruitment to target with a 4-month COVID-19 pandemic-related extension. This paper presents the key recruitment challenges, and the strategies delivered to optimise recruitment and informed consent.

designA multifaceted, flexible, mixed-method approach to investigate recruitment obstacles drawing on data from staff/patient interviews, audio recorded study recruitment consultations and screening logs. Key findings were translated into strategies targeting identified issues. Data collection, analysis, feedback and strategy implementation continued cyclically throughout the recruitment period.

settingSecondary thoracic cancer care.

resultsRespiratory physicians, oncologists, surgeons and nursing specialists supported the trial, but recruitment challenges were evident. The study had to fit within a framework of a thoracic cancer service considered overstretched where patients encountered multiple healthcare professionals and treatment views, all of which challenged recruitment. Clinician treatment biases, shaped in part by the wider clinical and research context alongside experience, adversely impacted several aspects of the recruitment process by restricting referrals for study consideration, impacting eligibility decisions, affecting the neutrality in which the study and treatment was presented and shaping patient treatment expectations and preferences. Individual and group recruiter feedback and training raised awareness of key equipoise issues, offered support and shared good practice to safeguard informed consent and optimise recruitment.

conclusionsWith bespoke support to overcome identified issues, recruitment to a challenging RCT of surgery versus no surgery in a thoracic cancer setting with a complex recruitment pathway and multiple health professional involvement is possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN ISRCTN44351742, Clinical Trials.gov NCT02040272.

Indexed as

COVID-19MesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantPatient SelectionFemaleHumansInformed ConsentLung NeoplasmsMalePleural NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Clinical TrialONCOLOGYQUALITATIVE RESEARCHRandomized Controlled TrialThoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38760029
PMCPMC11103236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.