Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38759959›Full record

ReviewSeminars in neurology2024

Updates in Management of Large Hemispheric Infarct.

Charlene J Ong, Stefanos Chatzidakis, Jimmy J Ong, Steven Feske

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlene J OngDepartment of Neurology, Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stefanos ChatzidakisDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jimmy J OngDepartment of Neurology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Steven FeskeDepartment of Neurology, Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Dynamic Risk Prediction of Life-Threatening Mass Effect After Ischemic StrokeK23NS116033 · NINDS · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI ONG, CHARLENE J · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS116033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review delves into updates in management of large hemispheric infarction (LHI), a condition affecting up to 10% of patients with supratentorial strokes. While traditional management paradigms have endured, recent strides in research have revolutionized the approach to acute therapies, monitoring, and treatment. Notably, advancements in triage methodologies and the application of both pharmacological and mechanical abortive procedures have reshaped the acute care trajectory for patients with LHI. Moreover, ongoing endeavors have sought to refine strategies for the optimal surveillance and mitigation of complications, notably space-occupying mass effect, which can ensue in the aftermath of LHI. By amalgamating contemporary guidelines with cutting-edge clinical trial findings, this review offers a comprehensive exploration of the current landscape of acute and ongoing patient care for LHI, illuminating the evolving strategies that underpin effective management in this critical clinical domain.

Indexed as

Cerebral InfarctionDisease ManagementHumans

Identifiers

PMID38759959
PMCPMC11210577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.