ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2024
MRI-CEUS fusion-guided lymphatic mapping as a preoperative strategy for lymphedema patients undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Research progress on the application of ultrasound technology in the diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2025
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2025
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveContrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is useful in mapping lymphatic vessels in upper limb lymphedema; this study was aimed to evaluate its efficiency in lower limb lymphedema and investigate whether magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) enhance the efficiency of CEUS.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 48 patients with lymphedema undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery who received MRL and/or CEUS in addition to conventional indocyanine green (ICG) lymphangiography. The number of anastomotic sites and the duration per site (DPS) for LVA surgery were described and compared.
resultsAmong the 48 patients subjected to analysis, it was observed that 12 (25%), 20 (41.67%), and 16 (33.33%) of them received ICG, ICG+CEUS, and ICG+CEUS+MRL, respectively. The ICG+CEUS group demonstrated a significant increase in the number of LVAs (median, 5; range, 4-7), compared with the ICG group (median, 2; range, 1-4) (P < .001). Moreover, the ICG+CEUS+MRL group exhibited a higher number of LVAs (median, 8; range, 7-8.25) compared with both the ICG+CEUS and ICG groups (P < .001). For lower limb lymphedema, the ICG+CEUS+MRL group displayed an elevated number of LVAs (median, 8; interquartile range, 7-9) (P = .003), in contrast to the ICG group (median, 3; interquartile range, 1.75-4.25). Furthermore, the DPS in the ICG+CEUS+MRL group (median, 50.56; interquartile range, 48.13-59.29) (P = .005) exhibited a remarkable decrease when compared with the ICG group (median, 131.25; interquartile range, 86.75-198.13]).
conclusionsMRL-CEUS fusion demonstrates superior performance in the identification of lymphatic vessels for lymphedema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.