Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38759478›Full record

ArticleJournal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology2024

Photobiomodulation for pain relief: Model-based estimates of effective doses of light at the neural target.

Andrew Buzza, Kalista Tapas, Juanita Anders, Michael Jenkins, Michael Moffitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew BuzzaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: axb1276@case.edu.
Kalista TapasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Juanita AndersDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology, and Genetics, Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Michael JenkinsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michael MoffittDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

Integrated Neural Engineering and Rehabilitation Training ProgramT32EB004314 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey R Capadona, Robert F. Kirsch · 2004 to 2026
$6.1M
Characterization of the Properties and Mechanisms of Photobiomodulation-Induced Axonal Block and Evaluation as a Treatment for Neuropathic PainR01NS121372 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERS, JUANITA J, JENKINS, MICHAEL W. · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004314NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhotobiomodulation (PBM) has been studied since the 1960s as a clinical tool. More recently, PBM has been observed to reduce compound action potential components and hypersensitivities associated with neuropathic pains. However, no definitive description of efficacious light parameters has been determined. Some reasons may be that previous meta-analyses and reviews have focused on emitter output rather than the light at the target tissue and have included data sets that are large but with notable variability (e.g., combining data from various disease etiologies, and data from PBM at various wavelengths). This fact has made it difficult to successfully define the range of effective parameters.

methodsIn this study, photon propagation software was used to estimate irradiance at a target nerve using several published data sets chosen for their narrow criteria to minimize variability. Utilizing these estimates, effective and ineffective light irradiances at the nerve of interest for wavelengths of 633 nm or 808-830 nm were examined and estimated. These estimates are focused on the amount of light required to achieve a reduction in pain or a surrogate measure via a hypothesized nerve block mechanism.

resultsAccounting for irradiance at the target nerve yielded a clear separation of PBM doses that achieved small-fiber nerve block from those that did not. For both the 633 nm group and the 808-830 group, the irradiance separation threshold followed a nonlinear path with respect to PBM application duration, where shorter durations required higher irradiances, and longer durations required lower irradiances. Using the same modeling methods, irradiance was estimated as a function of depth from a transcutaneous source (distance from skin surface) for emitter output power using small or large emitter sizes.

conclusionTaken together, the results of this study can be used to estimate effective PBM dosing schemes to achieve small-fiber inhibition for various anatomical scenarios.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyAnimalsHumansLightNeuralgiaPain ManagementDosimetryPain reliefPeripheral nervePhotobiomodulationPhoton propagation

Identifiers

PMID38759478
PMCPMC11482420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.