Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38759088›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2024

Technology trends in practice: A survey of occupational therapy practitioners.

Addie Segal, Nancy W Doyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Addie SegalDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Sargent College of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Nancy W DoyleDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Sargent College of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the evolving digital revolution, technology and digital tools are becoming inseparable from work and daily occupations. Occupational therapy practitioners (OTPs) focus on supporting individuals in their desired and needed activities. Many of these daily activities (i.e., online banking, shopping, social media, smartphone use) require digital skills at a growing rate, and insufficient technological skills may subject individuals to limited engagement and social isolation.

objectiveTo understand OTPs attitudes regarding technology utilization.

methodsWe surveyed 109 OTPs about their attitudes, work practices, and barriers to addressing their clients' digital technological functioning.

resultsThe findings of our study suggest that while OTPs acknowledge the importance and potential benefit of technology for their clients, there is a notable professional gap in the training and skills of OTPs to support their clients' digital functioning effectively and to integrate technology into their practice.

conclusionsThere is a need to improve and expand OTP's digital skills and knowledge regarding addressing clients' digital functioning and technology implementation in occupational therapy practice.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational TherapistsSurveys and Questionnairescompetency-based educationcomputer literacyOccupational therapyprofessional competenceprofessional practicetechnologywork

Identifiers

PMID38759088
PMCPMC11613022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.