ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2024
Deep learning-based differentiation of ventricular septal defect from tetralogy of Fallot in fetal echocardiography images.
Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Confounder-Matched Deep Learning on Cardiac CT for the Diagnosis of Tetralogy of Fallot: A Proof of Concept.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Current status and prospects of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of congenital heart disease in fetuses: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Tetralogy of Fallot: From Prenatal Diagnosis to Lifelong Management: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Combining curriculum learning and weakly supervised attention for enhanced thyroid nodule assessment in ultrasound imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- The Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Echocardiographic Detection of Congenital Heart Defects in the Fetus: A Mini-Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- A Real-Time End-to-End Framework with a Stacked Model Using Ultrasound Video for Cardiac Septal Defect Decision-Making.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- A systematic review on deep learning in ventricular septal defect screening, diagnosis, and management.Annals of pediatric cardiologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital heart disease (CHD) seriously affects children's health and quality of life, and early detection of CHD can reduce its impact on children's health. Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and ventricular septal defect (VSD) are two types of CHD that have similarities in echocardiography. However, TOF has worse diagnosis and higher morality than VSD. Accurate differentiation between VSD and TOF is highly important for administrative property treatment and improving affected factors' diagnoses.
objectiveTOF and VSD were differentiated using convolutional neural network (CNN) models that classified fetal echocardiography images.
methodsWe collected 105 fetal echocardiography images of TOF and 96 images of VSD. Four CNN models, namely, VGG19, ResNet50, NTS-Net, and the weakly supervised data augmentation network (WSDAN), were used to differentiate the two congenital heart diseases. The performance of these four models was compared based on sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, and AUC.
resultsVGG19 and ResNet50 performed similarly, with AUCs of 0.799 and 0.802, respectively. A superior performance was observed with NTS-Net and WSDAN specific for fine-grained image categorization tasks, with AUCs of 0.823 and 0.873, respectively. WSDAN had the best performance among all models tested.
conclusionsWSDAN exhibited the best performance in differentiating between TOF and VSD and is worthy of further clinical popularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.