Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38759022›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2024

Increased Diagnostic Yield by Reanalysis of Whole Exome Sequencing Data in Mitochondrial Disease.

Catarina Olimpio, Ida Paramonov, Leslie Matalonga, Steven Laurie, Katherine Schon, Kiran Polavarapu, Janbernd Kirschner, Ulrike Schara-Schmidt, Hanns Lochmüller, Patrick F Chinnery and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hepatic Phenotype in NBAS-Associated Disease: Clinical Course, Prognostic Factors and Outcome in 230 Patients.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. The Use of AI for Phenotype-Genotype Mapping.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Catarina OlimpioDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, John Van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ida ParamonovCentro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Barcelona, Spain.
Leslie MatalongaCentro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Barcelona, Spain.
Steven LaurieCentro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Barcelona, Spain.
Katherine SchonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, John Van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Kiran PolavarapuChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Janbernd KirschnerDepartment of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ulrike Schara-SchmidtDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Center for Neuromuscular Disorders, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Hanns LochmüllerCentro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Barcelona, Spain.
Patrick F ChinneryMRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rita HorvathDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, John Van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The genetic diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders is complicated by its genetic and phenotypic complexity. Next generation sequencing techniques have much improved the diagnostic yield for these conditions. A cohort of individuals with multiple respiratory chain deficiencies, reported in the literature 10 years ago, had a diagnostic rate of 60% by whole exome sequencing (WES) but 40% remained undiagnosed. Objective: We aimed to identify a genetic diagnosis by reanalysis of the WES data for the undiagnosed arm of this 10-year-old cohort of patients with suspected mitochondrial disorders. Methods: The WES data was transferred and processed by the RD-Connect Genome-Phenome Analysis Platform (GPAP) using their standardized pipeline. Variant prioritisation was carried out on the RD-Connect GPAP. Results: Singleton WES data from 14 individuals was reanalysed. We identified a possible or likely genetic diagnosis in 8 patients (8/14, 57%). The variants identified were in a combination of mitochondrial DNA (n = 1, MT-TN), nuclear encoded mitochondrial genes (n = 2, PDHA1, and SUCLA2) and nuclear genes associated with nonmitochondrial disorders (n = 5, PNPLA2, CDC40, NBAS and SLC7A7). Variants in both the NBAS and CDC40 genes were established as disease causing after the original cohort was published. We increased the diagnostic yield for the original cohort by 15% without generating any further genomic data. Conclusions: In the era of multiomics we highlight that reanalysis of existing WES data is a valid tool for generating additional diagnosis in patients with suspected mitochondrial disease, particularly when more time has passed to allow for new bioinformatic pipelines to emerge, for the development of new tools in variant interpretation aiding in reclassification of variants and the expansion of scientific knowledge on additional genes.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingMitochondrial DiseasesChildCohort StudiesDNA, MitochondrialFemaleHumansMaleDNA, MitochondrialMitochondrial diseasesmitochondrial genesnext generation sequencingrespiratory chain deficiencies

Identifiers

PMID38759022
PMCPMC11307028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.