SynthesisPloS one2024
Biomarkers for prognosis of meningioma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- Time-dependent prognostic value of automated Ki67 assessment and its integration with molecular risk profiling in WHO grade 2 meningioma.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- MIB-1 index predicts low recurrence risk after subtotal resection of meningiomas: a retrospective study of 505 patients.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- The Ki-67 proliferation index and recurrence risk of intracranial meningioma: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 5,050 patients.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Associations of surgical menopause and hormone replacement therapy with meningioma development.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Double Staining Immunohistochemistry and Digital Pathology: Moving Towards Standardization of the Proliferative Index Evaluation in Meningiomas.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Causal Pathways Linking Gut Microbiota, Serum Metabolites, and Meningioma Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Meningioma grade and molecular markers of proliferation, hypoxia, and vascularity as predictors of outcome in a cohort with long-term patient follow-up.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of MIB-1 index in meningioma: a retrospective cohort study to establish an optimal cutoff for recurrence and survival.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Quality of life in patients with skull base meningiomas treated with microsurgery: a prospective observational study.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Observational
- Article
- Olfactory Groove Meningioma Detected 10 Months after Cranial Radiotherapy in a Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma Survivor: A Case Report.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningioma is the most common primary brain tumor and many studies have evaluated numerous biomarkers for their prognostic value, often with inconsistent results. Currently, no reliable biomarkers are available to predict the survival, recurrence, and progression of meningioma patients in clinical practice. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of immunohistochemistry-based (IHC) biomarkers of meningioma patients. A systematic literature search was conducted up to November 2023 on PubMed, CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus databases. Two authors independently reviewed the identified relevant studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the studies included. Meta-analyses were performed with the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. A total of 100 studies with 16,745 patients were included in this review. As the promising markers to predict OS of meningioma patients, Ki-67/MIB-1 (HR = 1.03, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.05) was identified to associate with poor prognosis of the patients. Overexpression of cyclin A (HR = 4.91, 95%CI 1.38 to 17.44), topoisomerase II α (TOP2A) (HR = 4.90, 95%CI 2.96 to 8.12), p53 (HR = 2.40, 95%CI 1.73 to 3.34), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (HR = 1.61, 95%CI 1.36 to 1.90), and Ki-67 (HR = 1.33, 95%CI 1.21 to 1.46), were identified also as unfavorable prognostic biomarkers for poor RFS of meningioma patients. Conversely, positive progesterone receptor (PR) and p21 staining were associated with longer RFS and are considered biomarkers of favorable prognosis of meningioma patients (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88 and HR = 1.89, 95%CI 1.11 to 3.20). Additionally, high expression of Ki-67 was identified as a prognosis biomarker for poor PFS of meningioma patients (HR = 1.02, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.04). Although only in single studies, KPNA2, CDK6, Cox-2, MCM7 and PCNA are proposed as additional markers with high expression that are related with poor prognosis of meningioma patients. In conclusion, the results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that PR, cyclin A, TOP2A, p21, p53, VEGF and Ki-67 are either positively or negatively associated with survival of meningioma patients and might be useful biomarkers to assess the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.