ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
Bayesian Lookahead Perturbation Policy for Inference of Regulatory Networks.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Reinforcement Learning for Intervention of Partially Observable Regulatory Networks.Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference · 2025Article
- Pareto-Optimal Interventions in Gene Regulatory Networks using Signal Temporal Logic.Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference · 2025Article
- Bayesian Topology Inference of Regulatory Networks under Partial Observability.Results in control and optimization · 2025Article
- Bayesian Optimization for State and Parameter Estimation of Dynamic Networks with Binary Space.Control Technology and Applications. Control Technology and Applications · 2024Article
- Bayesian reinforcement learning for navigation planning in unknown environments.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Kernel-Based Particle Filtering for Scalable Inference in Partially Observed Boolean Dynamical Systems.IFAC-PapersOnLine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The complexity, scale, and uncertainty in regulatory networks (e.g., gene regulatory networks and microbial networks) regularly pose a huge uncertainty in their models. These uncertainties often cannot be entirely reduced using limited and costly data acquired from the normal condition of systems. Meanwhile, regulatory networks often suffer from the non-identifiability issue, which refers to scenarios where the true underlying network model cannot be clearly distinguished from other possible models. Perturbation or excitation is a well-known process in systems biology for acquiring targeted data to reveal the complex underlying mechanisms of regulatory networks and overcome the non-identifiability issue. We consider a general class of Boolean network models for capturing the activation and inactivation of components and their complex interactions. Assuming partial available knowledge about the interactions between components of the networks, this paper formulates the inference process through the maximum aposteriori (MAP) criterion. We develop a Bayesian lookahead policy that systematically perturbs regulatory networks to maximize the performance of MAP inference under the perturbed data. This is achieved by optimally formulating the perturbation process in a reinforcement learning context and deriving a scalable deep reinforcement learning perturbation policy to compute near-optimal Bayesian policy. The proposed method learns the perturbation policy through planning without the need for any real data. The high performance of the proposed approach is demonstrated by comprehensive numerical experiments using the well-known mammalian cell cycle and gut microbial community networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.