Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38758570›Full record

Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2024

The Impact of Back Optic Zone Design in Orthokeratology on Visual Performance.

Xiaoqin Chen, Ying Guo, Hua Bi, Xuewei Liu, Yiyuan Wu, Ting Wang, Lihua Li, Wenli Lu, Maria Liu, Yan Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. [Effect of Back Optical Zone Diameter of Orthokeratology Lens on Visual Quality in Myopic Children].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoqin ChenClinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Ying GuoClinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Hua BiCollege of Optometry, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA.
Xuewei LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yiyuan WuTianjin Eye Hospital Optometric Center, Tianjin, China.
Ting WangTianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Lihua LiTianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wenli LuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Maria LiuSchool of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Yan WangClinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the visual performance in adolescents undergoing orthokeratology (OrthoK) treatment with two different optical zone diameters (OZDs). Methods: This randomized, double-masked, self-controlled prospective study was conducted at Tianjin Eye Hospital (Tianjin, China) in June 2022. Thirty-six eligible schoolchildren were enrolled and fitted with corneal refractive therapy lenses with two sizes of OZDs (5 mm [5OZ] and 6 mm [6OZ]). Each participant was randomized to wear the 5OZ in one eye and the 6OZ in the contralateral eye. Subjective visual quality was assessed using visual acuity, refraction, contrast sensitivity function, and visual symptoms, and the objective optical quality was assessed using ocular higher order aberrations (HOAs) and modulation transfer function (MTF). Results: Thirty-five myopic children completed a 1-month follow-up visit. The 5OZ lens induced significantly smaller treatment zone diameters than the 6OZ lens (P < 0.001). Subjective visual quality did not differ significantly between the two groups. Compared to baseline, aberrations of Z40, coma-like, spherical-like, and total HOAs in both groups increased significantly (P < 0.05). For the 3-mm pupils, spherical aberration in the 5OZ group was significantly higher than that in the 6OZ group (P < 0.05). The MTF value of the 6OZ group was significantly higher than that of 5OZ group for 0.3 and 1.5 cycles per degree for the 3-mm pupils (P = 0.006 and P = 0.026, respectively). However, HOAs or MTF did not differ significantly between the two groups for the 5-mm pupils. Conclusions: The difference induced by varying OZD was significant only in the smaller pupil condition. The selection of OZD in OrthoK designs in real-world patient management should be done while considering individual pupil size. Translational Relevance: This study revealed that the objective visual quality of small OZD lenses was only slightly affected for the small pupil size.

Indexed as

MyopiaOrthokeratologic ProceduresRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityAdolescentChildContact LensesContrast SensitivityDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38758570
PMCPMC11107949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.