ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Invariant Content Representation for Generalizable Medical Image Segmentation.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Domain generalization (DG) for medical image segmentation due to privacy preservation prefers learning from a single-source domain and expects good robustness on unseen target domains. To achieve this goal, previous methods mainly use data augmentation to expand the distribution of samples and learn invariant content from them. However, most of these methods commonly perform global augmentation, leading to limited augmented sample diversity. In addition, the style of the augmented image is more scattered than the source domain, which may cause the model to overfit the style of the source domain. To address the above issues, we propose an invariant content representation network (ICRN) to enhance the learning of invariant content and suppress the learning of variability styles. Specifically, we first design a gamma correction-based local style augmentation (LSA) to expand the distribution of samples by augmenting foreground and background styles, respectively. Then, based on the augmented samples, we introduce invariant content learning (ICL) to learn generalizable invariant content from both augmented and source-domain samples. Finally, we design domain-specific batch normalization (DSBN) based style adversarial learning (SAL) to suppress the learning of preferences for source-domain styles. Experimental results show that our proposed method improves by 8.74% and 11.33% in overall dice coefficient (Dice) and reduces 15.88 mm and 3.87 mm in overall average surface distance (ASD) on two publicly available cross-domain datasets, Fundus and Prostate, compared to the state-of-the-art DG methods. The code is available at https://github.com/ZMC-IIIM/ICRN-DG .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.