SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2024
Robotic and endoscopic trans-oral total laryngectomy, a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Transoral Robotic Total Laryngectomy With the Da Vinci Single Port Robotic System.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trans-oral total laryngectomy (TOTL) is a novel minimally invasive approach to narrow-field laryngectomy. The objective of this study was to review published data on robotic and endoscopic-assisted TOTL to examine oncologic, functional, and adverse outcomes. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched between January 2009 and December 2023. PRISMA guidelines were used for data abstraction independently by two reviewers. Proportional meta-analysis (random effects model) was used for analysis. Main outcomes included oncologic outcomes (margin status, recurrence rate) and surgical complications (fistula, hemorrhage, need for second operation). Eight studies were included (total of 37 patients). Cases included 31 robotic-assisted, 3 endoscopic-assisted, and 3 robotic cases which required conversion to open approach. Most cases were performed for laryngeal SCC (22 patients, 59.5%). Primary closure was achieved in all patients. Negative margins were achieved in 20 of 21 patients with LSCC. Recurrence data was reported in 20 LSCC patients with disease recurrence in 4 patients (20%). Follow-up was described for 15 patients (mean of 3.5 years, range 1.6-5.8 years). Eleven complications occurred including fistula, bleed, and stomal stenosis with a pooled rate of 33.7% (95% CI: 16.4-53.0%, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
38758418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.