Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38758405›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Evolution of a laboratory mechanomyograph.

Zain Wedemeyer, Andrew Bowdle, Srdjan Jelacic, Aidan Lopez, Willis Silliman, Kelly E Michaelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zain WedemeyerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Box 356540, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195-6540, USA.
Andrew BowdleDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Box 356540, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195-6540, USA.
Srdjan JelacicDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Box 356540, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195-6540, USA.
Aidan LopezDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Box 356540, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195-6540, USA.
Willis SillimanDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Box 356540, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195-6540, USA.
Kelly E MichaelsenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Box 356540, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195-6540, USA. kellyem@uw.edu.

Funding

Intelligent wearable system for preventing medication errors in anesthesiologyK08GM153069 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kelly Michaelsen · 2024 to 2026
$713k
NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM153069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanomyography is currently the accepted laboratory reference standard for quantitative neuromuscular blockade monitoring. Mechanomyographs are not commercially available. Previously, a mechanomyograph was built by our laboratory and used in several clinical studies. It was subsequently redesigned to improve its usability and functionality and to accommodate a wider range of hand sizes and shapes using an iterative design process. Each version of the redesigned device was initially tested for usability and functionality in the lab with the investigators as subjects without electrical stimulation. The redesigned devices were then assessed on patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking drugs. Since the patients were not paralyzed, the expected train-of-four ratio was 1.0. The device accuracy and precision were represented by the train-of-four ratio mean and standard deviation. If issues with the device's useability or functionality were discovered, changes were made, and the redesign processes repeated. The final mechanomyograph design was used to collect 2,362 train-of-four ratios from 21 patients. The mean and standard deviation of the train-of-four ratios were 0.99 ± 0.030. Additionally, the final mechanomyograph design was easier to use and adjust than the original design and fit a wider range of hand sizes. The final design also reduced the frequency of adjustments and the time needed for adjustments, facilitating data collection during a surgical procedure.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignMyographyNeuromuscular BlockadeAdultAnesthesia, GeneralElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeReproducibility of ResultsMechanomyographyMedical devicesNeuromuscular blockade monitoringQuantitative monitoringTrain-of-four monitoringTwitch monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38758405
PMCPMC11604740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.