Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38758400›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2024

Fluid absorption during flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure: a randomized controlled trial.

Xiaolin Deng, Yijian Chen, Qiliang Zhai, Leming Song, Chuance Du, Wanlong Tan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05201599 (Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Flexible Ureteroscope With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05201599 naunknown statusnot on this map

Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Flexible Ureteroscope With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure(FURL-ICP): a Multicenter, Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuohua ZengRan2021 to 2022Enrolled449ConditionsUrinary CalculiArmsFlexible ureteroscope with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaolin Deng *Department of Urology, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 17 Hongqi Avenue, Ganzhou City, 341000, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Yijian Chen *Department of Urology, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 17 Hongqi Avenue, Ganzhou City, 341000, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Qiliang ZhaiDepartment of Urology, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 17 Hongqi Avenue, Ganzhou City, 341000, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Leming SongDepartment of Urology, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 17 Hongqi Avenue, Ganzhou City, 341000, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Chuance DuDepartment of Urology, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 17 Hongqi Avenue, Ganzhou City, 341000, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Wanlong TanDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. 18770738881@sina.cn.

Funding

Jiangxi Provincial Science and Technology Agency 20202BBGL73089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate fluid absorption and its influencing factors during flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure (RPP).

methodsA total of 80 patients with upper urinary tract calculi underwent flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of RPP by pressure-measuring ureteral access sheath and were randomly divided into four groups. The RPP of Groups A, B, and C were set at - 5, 0 and 5 mmHg, respectively. Conventional flexible ureteroscopy with uncontrolled pressure served as control Group D. The perfusion flow rate was set at 100 ml/min in the four groups, with 20 patients in each group. The fluid absorption was measured by 1% ethanol every 10 min. Operation time, stone-free rate, and complications were recorded.

resultSeventy-three patients were finally included in the RCT. The general and preoperative data of the patients were comparable between the groups. The fluid absorption of Groups A, B, and C was significantly less than that of Group D (P < 0.01). Fluid absorption and operation time were positively correlated, and the correlation coefficients R were 0.864, 0.896, 0.918, and 0.947, respectively (P < 0.01). The fluid absorption of patients with vomiting, fever and ureteral injury was greater than that of patients without complications in the four groups (P < 0.01). In different groups, fluid absorption was greater in patients with ureteral injury Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) 1-3 than in noninjured patients (P < 0.01).

conclusionFlexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of RPP effectively reduces the absorption of perfusion fluid. Operation time and ureteral injury are also key factors affecting perfusion fluid absorption. REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE: NCT05201599; August 11, 2021.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiKidney PelvisPressureUreteroscopesUreteroscopyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedComplicationFluid absorptionRandomized controlled trialRenal pelvic pressureUreteroscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.