Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38758311›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Biolistic Transformation of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Dena L Toffaletti, Jennifer L Tenor, John R Perfect

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dena L ToffalettiDuke University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer L TenorDuke University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, NC, USA.
John R PerfectDuke University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, NC, USA. john.perfect@duke.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biolistic transformation of Cryptococcus neoformans is used as a molecular tool to genetically alter or delete targeted genes. The DNA is introduced into the yeast on DNA-coated gold beads by a helium shock wave produced using a biolistic particle system. The procedure often involves insertion of a dominant selectable marker into the desired site by homologous recombination. To increase the likelihood of homologous recombination, large fragments of overlapping DNA are used. The two most used dominant selectable markers are nourseothricin and Geneticin. With the need to generate multiple gene deletions in the same strain, there are recyclable marker systems, such as the bacteriophage P1 Cre-loxP system or CRISPR that provide additional useful molecular tools. While newer strategies exist to generate deletions and introduce markers and other gene modifications, biolistic transformation has remained a viable tool to facilitate the construction of genetically modified yeast strains. This chapter provides a working protocol on how to delete and restore a gene in C. neoformans.

Indexed as

BiolisticsCryptococcus neoformansTransformation, GeneticGene DeletionHomologous RecombinationBiolistic transformationCre-recombinaseCryptococcus neoformansDrug selection cassetteGene deletionGene reconstitutionGeneticinHomologous recombinationloxPNourseothricin

Identifiers

PMID38758311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.