ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Performance of AI to exclude normal chest radiographs to reduce radiologists' workload.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The RATAB Framework: An Interpretable AI-Driven Radiographic Risk Stratification Model for Suspected Lung Lesions.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Primary Care Doctors' Perspectives and Experiences With a Chest X-Ray AI Triage Program: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Review of Artificial Intelligence for Automated Assessment of Lines, Drains, and Airways on Pediatric and Adult Chest Radiographs.Pediatric reports · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance with sensitivity/specificity optimized computer-aided detection to detect common abnormalities in chest radiography.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- When intelligence meets radiology: the dual impact of ai on radiologists' workload, burnout, and economic value.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Evaluating an AI-driven Triaging Workflow for MRI-based Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Simulation Study.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Observational
- An Adaptive Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Diagnosis Using a Hybrid CNN-Transformer Architecture and Class-Wise Ensemble Fusion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evidence-Guided Diagnostic Reasoning for Pediatric Chest Radiology Based on Multimodal Large Language Models.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- How threshold customisation affects the performance of a multiclass X-ray AI model for primary care triage: a retrospective study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Swin-Qwen3: a three-stage vision-language framework for automated radiology report generation with multi-agent verification.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Active and Inactive Tuberculosis Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks with MLP-Mixer.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- [Precision medicine in the diagnostics and treatment of cardiomyopathies : State of the art].Herz · 2025Review
- Automated classification of chest X-rays: a deep learning approach with attention mechanisms.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Autonomous chest x-ray image classification, capabilities and prospects: rapid evidence assessment.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Narrative Review of Recent Clinical Applications, Implementation Strategies, and Challenges.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Review
- Oncologic Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning Methods in CT Spine Imaging-A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study investigates the performance of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) system to identify normal chest radiographs and its potential to reduce radiologist workload.
methodsRetrospective analysis included consecutive chest radiographs from two medical centers between Oct 1, 2016 and Oct 14, 2016. Exclusions comprised follow-up exams within the inclusion period, bedside radiographs, incomplete images, imported radiographs, and pediatric radiographs. Three chest radiologists categorized findings into normal, clinically irrelevant, clinically relevant, urgent, and critical. A commercial AI system processed all radiographs, scoring 10 chest abnormalities on a 0-100 confidence scale. AI system performance was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC), assessing the detection of normal radiographs. Sensitivity was calculated for the default and a conservative operating point. the detection of negative predictive value (NPV) for urgent and critical findings, as well as the potential workload reduction, was calculated.
resultsA total of 2603 radiographs were acquired in 2141 unique patients. Post-exclusion, 1670 radiographs were analyzed. Categories included 479 normal, 332 clinically irrelevant, 339 clinically relevant, 501 urgent, and 19 critical findings. The AI system achieved an AUC of 0.92. Sensitivity for normal radiographs was 92% at default and 53% at the conservative operating point. At the conservative operating point, NPV was 98% for urgent and critical findings, and could result in a 15% workload reduction.
conclusionA commercially available AI system effectively identifies normal chest radiographs and holds the potential to lessen radiologists' workload by omitting half of the normal exams from reporting. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The AI system is able to detect half of all normal chest radiographs at a clinically acceptable operating point, thereby potentially reducing the workload for the radiologists by 15%. KEY POINTS: The AI system reached an AUC of 0.92 for the detection of normal chest radiographs. Fifty-three percent of normal chest radiographs were identified with a NPV of 98% for urgent findings. AI can reduce the workload of chest radiography reporting by 15%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.