Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38758239›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2024

The lymphocyte/monocyte ratio predicts the efficacy of isatuximab plus pomalidomide in multiple myeloma patients.

Yutaka Shimazu, Junya Kanda, Yoshiyuki Onda, Shin-Ichi Fuchida, Kensuke Ohta, Yuji Shimura, Satoru Kosugi, Ryosuke Yamamura, Mitsuhiro Matsuda, Hitoshi Hanamoto and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Yutaka ShimazuDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54, Kyoto, Kawaramachi, Shogoin, Sakyoku, 606-8507, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-7220
Junya KandaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54, Kyoto, Kawaramachi, Shogoin, Sakyoku, 606-8507, Japan. jkanda16@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6704-3633
Yoshiyuki OndaDepartment of Hematology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3093-4974
Shin-Ichi FuchidaDepartment of Hematology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4147-9113
Kensuke OhtaHematology Ohta Clinic, Shinsaibashi, Japan.
Yuji ShimuraDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9309-7902
Satoru KosugiDepartment of Hematology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9057-5761
Ryosuke YamamuraDepartment of Hematology, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Mitsuhiro MatsudaDepartment of Hematology, PL General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4068-166X
Hitoshi HanamotoDepartment of Hematology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Japan.
Yoko AdachiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Japan Community Health Care Organization Kobe Central Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoyuki AnzaiDepartment of Hematology, Uji Tokushukai Hospital, Uji, Japan.
Masaaki HottaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Kentaro FukushimaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hideo YagiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan.
Satoshi YoshiharaDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Yasuhiro TanakaDepartment of Hematology, Shinko Hospital, Kobe, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7889-3097
Teruhito TakakuwaDepartment of Hematology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hirokazu TanakaDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Higashiosaka, Japan.
Hirohiko ShibayamaDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Nobuhiko UoshimaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoki HosenDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoki ItoFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5419-9156
Chihiro ShimazakiDepartment of Hematology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1006-7749
Itaru MatsumuraDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Higashiosaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2818-4270
Junya KurodaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Akifumi Takaori-KondoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54, Kyoto, Kawaramachi, Shogoin, Sakyoku, 606-8507, Japan.
Masayuki HinoDepartment of Hematology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIsatuximab, an anti-CD38 antibody, has been widely used in treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Despite its high efficacy, not all patients achieve a lasting therapeutic response with isatuximab.

objectiveWe tried to identify biomarkers to predict the effectiveness of isatuximab by focusing on the host's immune status before treatment.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the cases of 134 relapsed/refractory MM patients in the Kansai Myeloma Forum database who had received only a first isatuximab treatment.

resultsAmong the 134 patients, an isatuximab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-PD) regimen, isatuximab, carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-KD) regimen and isatuximab and/or dexamethasone (Isa-D) regimen were used in 112, 15 and 7 patients, respectively. The median age at treatment, number of prior treatment regimens, and progression-free survival (PFS) were 71, 6, and 6.54 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the PFS under the Isa-PD regimen was longer in patients with higher lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR ≥ 4), fewer prior treatment regimens (< 6), and no use of prior daratumumab treatment. The OS under the Isa-PD regimen was longer in patients with higher white blood cell counts (WBC counts ≥ 3000/μL) and higher LMR. The PFS under the Isa-D regimen was longer in patients with fewer prior treatment regimens in univariate analysis, but no parameters were correlated with PFS/OS under the Isa-KD regimen.

conclusionWe found that the patients with higher LMR (≥ 4) could obtain longer PFS and OS under the Isa-PD regimen. Other cohort studies of isatuximab treatment might be necessary to substantiate our results.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsLymphocytesMonocytesMultiple MyelomaThalidomideAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedisatuximabpomalidomideThalidomideIsatuximabLymphocyte/monocyte ratioMultiple myelomaPredictive markers

Identifiers

PMID38758239
PMCPMC11101389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.