Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38758205›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2024

Tenofovir, emtricitabine, lamivudine and dolutegravir concentrations in plasma and urine following drug intake cessation in a randomized controlled directly observed pharmacokinetic trial to aid point-of-care testing.

Laura J Else, Laura Dickinson, Stacey Edick, Ashley Zyhowski, Ken Ho, Leslie Meyn, Sujan Dilly-Penchala, Beth Thompson, Victoria Shaw, Saye Khoo and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura J ElseDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Laura DickinsonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Stacey EdickDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ashley ZyhowskiMagee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ken HoDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Leslie MeynDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sujan Dilly-PenchalaDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Beth ThompsonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Victoria ShawDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Saye KhooDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Rhonda M BrandDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Development of a urine-based point-of-care test for adherence to antiretroviral drugsR01AI122301 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI BRAND, RHONDA METTER, KHOO, SAYE · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI122301NIH HHS 5R01AI122301-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor adherence to ART and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can impact patient and public health. Point-of-care testing (POCT) may aid monitoring and adherence interventions.

objectivesWe report the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir [dosed as tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)], emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (3TC) and dolutegravir (DTG) in plasma and urine following drug cessation to evaluate adherence targets in urine for POCT.

methodsSubjects were randomized (1:1) to receive DTG/FTC/TAF or DTG/3TC/TDF for 15 days. Plasma and spot urine were collected on Day 15 (0-336 h post final dose). Drug concentrations were quantified using LC-MS, and non-linear mixed-effects models applied to determine drug disposition between matrices and relationship with relevant plasma [dolutegravir protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (PA-IC90 = 64 ng/mL) and minimum effective concentration (MEC = 324 ng/mL)] and urinary thresholds [tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 1500 ng/mL].

resultsOf 30 individuals enrolled, 29 were included (72% female at birth, 90% Caucasian). Median (range) predicted time to plasma dolutegravir PA-IC90 and MEC were 83.5 (41.0-152) and 49.0 h (23.7-78.9), corresponding to geometric mean (90%) urine concentrations of 5.42 (4.37-6.46) and 27.4 ng/mL (22.1-32.7). Tenofovir in urine reached 1500 ng/mL by 101 h (58.6-205) with an equivalent plasma concentration of 6.20 ng/mL (4.21-8.18).

conclusionsThese data support use of a urinary tenofovir threshold of <1500 ng/mL (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimens) as a marker of three or more missed doses for a POCT platform. However, due to low dolutegravir concentrations in urine, POCT would be limited to a readout of recent dolutegravir intake (one missed dose).

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsEmtricitabineHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHIV InfectionsLamivudineOxazinesPiperazinesPoint-of-Care TestingPyridonesTenofovirAdultDolutegravirFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceAnti-HIV AgentsDolutegravirEmtricitabineHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingLamivudineOxazinesPiperazinesPyridonesTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID38758205
PMCPMC11215529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.