Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38758005›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2024

Timing-dependent synergies between motor cortex and posterior spinal stimulation in humans.

James R McIntosh, Evan F Joiner, Jacob L Goldberg, Phoebe Greenwald, Alexandra C Dionne, Lynda M Murray, Earl Thuet, Oleg Modik, Evgeny Shelkov, Joseph M Lombardi and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07607665 (Paired Stimulation of Hand Motor Cortex and Median Nerve to Induce Spinal Cord Plasticity in Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07607665 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Paired Stimulation of Hand Motor Cortex and Median Nerve to Induce Spinal Cord Plasticity in Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2026 to 2032Enrolled25ConditionsHemiplegic Cerebral PalsyArmsPaired brain and nerve stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

James R McIntoshDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3970-1619
Evan F JoinerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7243-8779
Jacob L GoldbergDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian, Och Spine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-9387
Phoebe GreenwaldDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-0567-9755
Alexandra C DionneDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-1070-0882
Lynda M MurrayRehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7467-5607
Earl ThuetNew York Presbyterian, The Och Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7743-2309
Oleg ModikDepartment of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian, Och Spine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6270-413X
Evgeny ShelkovDepartment of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian, Och Spine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2402-6454
Joseph M LombardiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-3027
Zeeshan M SardarDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8417-3798
Ronald A LehmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5799-9885
Andrew K ChanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6953-0120
K Daniel RiewDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian, Och Spine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2083-9375
Noam Y HarelRehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3085-2194
Michael S VirkDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine - New York Presbyterian, Och Spine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8511-5602
Christopher MandigoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9676-5205
Jason B CarmelDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3933-3692

Funding

Spinal Cord Associative PlasticityR01NS124224 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CARMEL, JASON BRANT, HAREL, NOAM Y. · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volitional movement requires descending input from the motor cortex and sensory feedback through the spinal cord. We previously developed a paired brain and spinal electrical stimulation approach in rats that relies on convergence of the descending motor and spinal sensory stimuli in the cervical cord. This approach strengthened sensorimotor circuits and improved volitional movement through associative plasticity. In humans, it is not known whether posterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted at the sensorimotor interface or anterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted within the motor system is effective at facilitating brain evoked responses. In 59 individuals undergoing elective cervical spine decompression surgery, the motor cortex was stimulated with scalp electrodes and the spinal cord was stimulated with epidural electrodes, with muscle responses being recorded in arm and leg muscles. Spinal electrodes were placed either posteriorly or anteriorly, and the interval between cortex and spinal cord stimulation was varied. Pairing stimulation between the motor cortex and spinal sensory (posterior) but not spinal motor (anterior) stimulation produced motor evoked potentials that were over five times larger than brain stimulation alone. This strong augmentation occurred only when descending motor and spinal afferent stimuli were timed to converge in the spinal cord. Paired stimulation also increased the selectivity of muscle responses relative to unpaired brain or spinal cord stimulation. Finally, clinical signs suggest that facilitation was observed in both injured and uninjured segments of the spinal cord. The large effect size of this paired stimulation makes it a promising candidate for therapeutic neuromodulation. KEY POINTS: Pairs of stimuli designed to alter nervous system function typically target the motor system, or one targets the sensory system and the other targets the motor system for convergence in cortex. In humans undergoing clinically indicated surgery, we tested paired brain and spinal cord stimulation that we developed in rats aiming to target sensorimotor convergence in the cervical cord. Arm and hand muscle responses to paired sensorimotor stimulation were more than five times larger than brain or spinal cord stimulation alone when applied to the posterior but not anterior spinal cord. Arm and hand muscle responses to paired stimulation were more selective for targeted muscles than the brain- or spinal-only conditions, especially at latencies that produced the strongest effects of paired stimulation. Measures of clinical evidence of compression were only weakly related to the paired stimulation effect, suggesting that it could be applied as therapy in people affected by disorders of the central nervous system.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalSpinal CordAdultAgedElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpinal Cord Stimulationcervicalelectrical stimulationepiduralmotor cortexmotor evoked potentialsmyelopathyspinal cord

Identifiers

PMID38758005
PMCPMC11178459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.