Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38757199›Full record

ArticleJournal of deaf studies and deaf education2024

Conversation and pragmatics in children who are hard-of-hearing: a scoping review.

Jenna Bongioletti, Maree Doble, Alison Purcell

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jenna BongiolettiFaculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Speech Pathology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8156-8439
Maree DobleFaculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Speech Pathology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6081-4511
Alison PurcellSchool of Health Sciences, Speech Pathology, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4623-4086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological and therapeutic advances have allowed many children who are born hard-of-hearing (HoH) to start school with age-appropriate spoken language skills, yet many of these children continue to find everyday conversations challenging. This scoping review maps the evidence related to development of conversation and pragmatic skills in children who are HoH and learning spoken language. The review followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Quality appraisal, data extraction, and thematic analysis were used to describe the data. Systematic searches identified 36 articles for inclusion. Sample sizes were small and heterogenous. Most studies focused on school-aged children with severe hearing loss or greater. Methodological rigor varied. Thematic analysis revealed two global themes. First, children who are HoH continue to find conversation and pragmatics difficult to master, and second, there are a set of audiological, communication, environmental, and demographic characteristics that are associated with better conversation and pragmatic outcomes, some of which are fixed, whereas others are malleable. Focused attention on designing valid and reliable assessments for conversation and pragmatic skills, and on developing therapeutic approaches targeting early conversation and pragmatic skill development, is needed to reduce the impact conversation and pragmatic differences across the lifespan.

Indexed as

CommunicationChildHearing LossHumansLanguage DevelopmentPersons with Hearing Disabilities

Identifiers

PMID38757199
PMCPMC11413802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.