Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38757143›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2024

Human Pose Estimation for Clinical Analysis of Gait Pathologies.

Manal Mostafa Ali, Maha Medhat Hassan, M Zaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manal Mostafa AliDepartment of Computer and System Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7324-5349
Maha Medhat HassanDepartment of Computer and System Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
M ZakiDepartment of Computer and System Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait analysis serves as a critical diagnostic tool for identifying neurologic and musculoskeletal damage. Traditional manual analysis of motion data, however, is labor-intensive and heavily reliant on the expertise and judgment of the therapist. This study introduces a binary classification method for the quantitative assessment of gait impairments, specifically focusing on Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a prevalent and fatal neuromuscular genetic disorder. The research compares spatiotemporal and sagittal kinematic gait features derived from 2D and 3D human pose estimation trajectories against concurrently recorded 3D motion capture (MoCap) data from healthy children. The proposed model leverages a novel benchmark dataset, collected from YouTube and publicly available datasets of their typically developed peers, to extract time-distance variables (e.g. speed, step length, stride time, and cadence) and sagittal joint angles of the lower extremity (e.g. hip, knee, and knee flexion angles). Machine learning and deep learning techniques are employed to discern patterns that can identify children exhibiting DMD gait disturbances. While the current model is capable of distinguishing between healthy subjects and those with DMD, it does not specifically differentiate between DMD patients and patients with other gait impairments. Experimental results validate the efficacy of our cost-effective method, which relies on recorded RGB video, in detecting gait abnormalities, achieving a prediction accuracy of 96.2% for Support Vector Machine (SVM) and 97% for the deep network.

Indexed as

2D and 3D HPEand DMDbiomechanicsHuman gait analysisLSTM-CNNmarkerless techniques

Identifiers

PMID38757143
PMCPMC11097739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.