ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Assessing the patient's affective perception of their psychotherapist: validation of the
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transference Assessment in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyPooled it
- Effectiveness of a Novel Web-Based Intervention to Enhance Therapeutic Relationships and Treatment Outcomes in Adult Individual Psychotherapy: Randomized Controlled Trial and Analysis of Predictors of Dropouts.JMIR mental health · 2024Trial
- Adaptive and Maladaptive Networks Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.Clinical psychology in Europe · 2026Article
- Therapist's Assessment of Their Patient's Session-Level Emotional Processes: Validation of the In-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire-Clinician Form.Journal of clinical psychology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the psychometric properties of the 24-item and 12-item real relationship inventory-client forms.PloS one · 2025Article
- Enhancing Psychotherapy Outcomes by Encouraging Patients to Regularly Self-Monitor, Reflect on, and Share Their Affective Responses Toward Their Therapist: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Patients' perspective on the therapeutic relationship and session quality: the central role of alliance.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Psychological, psychiatric, and behavioral sciences measurement scales: best practice guidelines for their development and validation.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Therapeutic relationship elements and therapy session outcomes: Protocol for a longitudinal study of the patient's perspective.Open research Europe · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychotherapists need effective tools to monitor changes in the patient's affective perception of the therapist and the therapeutic relationship during sessions to tailor therapeutic interventions and improve treatment outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Methods: Validation data was gathered from ( Results: The SPARQ has a two-factor structure: Positive Affect ( Discussion: The SPARQ proves to be a valuable instrument in clinical, training, and research contexts, adept at capturing patients' session-level affective responses towards their therapist and perceptions of the therapeutic alliance. Comprehensive descriptive statistics and a range of score precision indices have been reported, intended to serve as benchmarks for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.