ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2024
Optimizing Gantry Breakpoint Angles in Proton Therapy: Enhancing Efficiency and Patient Experience.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing proton therapy quality assurance with custom-designed Octopoint phantom and Gafchromic film.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The breakpoint for a 360° radiotherapy gantry is typically positioned at 180°. This arbitrary setting has not been systematically evaluated for efficiency and may cause redundant gantry rotation and extended setup times. Our study aimed to identify an optimal gantry breakpoint angle for a full-gantry proton therapy system, with the goal of minimizing gantry movement. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 70 months of clinically delivered proton therapy plans (9152 plans, 131 883 fractions), categorizing them by treatment site and mapping the fields from a partial-gantry to full-gantry orientation. For each delivered fraction, we computed the minimum total gantry rotation angle as a function of gantry breakpoint position, which was varied between 0° and 360° in 1° steps. This analysis was performed separately within the entire plan cohort and individual treatment sites, both with and without the capability of over-rotating 10° past the breakpoint from either direction (20° overlap). The optimal gantry breakpoint was identified as one which resulted in a low average gantry rotation per fraction. Results: Considering mechanical constraints, 130° was identified as a reasonable balance between increased gantry-rotation efficiency and practical treatment considerations. With a 20° overlap, this selection reduced the average gantry rotation by 41.4° per fraction when compared to the standard 180° breakpoint. Disease site subgroups showed the following reduction in average gantry rotation: gastrointestinal 192.2°, thoracic 56.3°, pediatric 44.9°, genitourinary 19.9°, central nervous system 10.7°, breast 2.8°, and head and neck 0.1°. Conclusion: For a full-gantry system, a breakpoint of 130° generally outperforms the conventional 180° breakpoint. This reduction is particularly impactful for gastrointestinal, pediatric, and thoracic sites, which constitute a significant proportion of cases at our center. The adjusted breakpoint could potentially streamline patient delivery, alleviate mechanical wear, and enhance treatment precision by reducing the likelihood of patient movement during delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.