ReviewArchives of medical science : AMS2024
Risk factors for cervical instability in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.
Review in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Cervical Spine: An Updated Review of Epidemiology, Imaging, and Surgical Indications.Spine surgery and related research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk factors for cervical instability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Material and methods: Computer searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, the Wan Fang database, the Chinese Scientific Journal Databases (VIP) database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM) from their establishment until November 2022. Results: A total of 8 articles were included in this study, including 1 cross-sectional study, 5 case-control studies, and 2 cohort study, including 3078 patients with RA. Meta-analysis results showed that: male sex (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.19-2.42), course of disease (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.29-2.28), long-term glucocorticosteroid use (OR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.97-2.40), Steinbrocker staging (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.61-3.28), disability at baseline (OR = 24.57, 95% CI: 5.51-109.60), peripheral joint destruction (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.56-3.21), Steinbrocker stage I-IV progression to disability (OR = 20.08, 95% CI: 4.18-96.53), and previous joint surgery (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.06-2.26) are the main risk factors for cervical instability in RA. Conclusions: There are many risk factors for cervical instability in RA. In clinical practice, special attention should be paid to patients who are male, have a longer course of disease, have long-term glucocorticosteroid use, have previous joint surgery, have peripheral joint damage, and develop disability in Steinbrocker stage I-IV. Attention should be paid to the high-risk groups mentioned above, and effective measures such as early screening and full monitoring should be taken to prevent the occurrence of cervical instability in RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.