ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024
Use of artificial intelligence and the future of peer review.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Peer Review: Advancing Rigor or Raising New Concerns?Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Comparison of DeepSeek AI and Human Reviewers in Structured Evaluation of Neurosurgical Manuscripts: A Pilot Study.Journal of neurological surgery reports · 2026Article
- AI-assisted peer review: enhancing evaluation while increasing author workload.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Empowering researchers and healthcare professionals in academic publishing: key insights and practical lessons from the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) workshop 2025.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence as a Safeguard for Clinical Scientific Integrity: A Human-AI Hybrid Model for Medical Peer Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Editorial: Research ethics and integrity in the artificial intelligence era.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Soft-Sensor Framework for Dissertation Peer Review Using BERT.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Gold standard research-reflections on the NIH announcement.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Navigating the AI frontier: Balancing efficiency and integrity in orthopaedic peer review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Neurosurgical journals' policies on artificial intelligence use in manuscript preparation and peer review.Neurosurgical review · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Ethical Risks and Practical Limits.Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2025Article
- Attitudes and perceptions of biomedical journal editors in chief towards the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in the scholarly publishing process: a cross-sectional survey.Research integrity and peer review · 2025Article
- Changing peer review practices: transforming roles and future challenges.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- Retractions in Otolaryngology Publications.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025Article
- Personal experience with AI-generated peer reviews: a case study.Research integrity and peer review · 2025Article
- The inevitable future of peer review: Human and AI integrated peer review system.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Supporting Effective Peer Review at Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Research Misconduct and Medical Journals.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2025Article
- Article
- The Growing Demand for Peer Review: Current Challenges and Potential Reforms.British journal of biomedical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conducting high-quality peer review of scientific manuscripts has become increasingly challenging. The substantial increase in the number of manuscripts, lack of a sufficient number of peer-reviewers, and questions related to effectiveness, fairness, and efficiency, require a different approach. Large-language models, 1 form of artificial intelligence (AI), have emerged as a new approach to help resolve many of the issues facing contemporary medicine and science. We believe AI should be used to assist in the triaging of manuscripts submitted for peer-review publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.