Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38756943›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Ovarian Cancer surgical consideration is markedly improved by the neural network powered-MIA3G multivariate index assay.

Manjusha Roy Choudhury, Todd C Pappas, Leo B Twiggs, Emma Caoili, Herbert Fritsche, Ryan T Phan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manjusha Roy ChoudhuryDepartment of Research and Development, Aspira Women's Health, Austin, TX, United States.
Todd C PappasDepartment of Research and Development, Aspira Women's Health, Austin, TX, United States.
Leo B TwiggsDivision of Clinical Operations and Medical Affairs, Aspira Women's Health, Austin, TX, United States.
Emma CaoiliDepartment of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance, Aspira Women's Health, Shelton, CT, United States.
Herbert FritscheAspira Labs, Aspira Women's Health, Austin, TX, United States.
Ryan T PhanDepartment of Research and Development, Aspira Women's Health, Austin, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgery remains the main treatment option for an adnexal mass suspicious of ovarian cancer. The malignancy rate is, however, only 10-15% in women undergoing surgery. This results in a high number of unnecessary surgeries. A surveillance-based approach is recommended to form the basis for surgical referrals. We have previously reported the clinical performance of MIA3G, a deep neural network-based algorithm, for assessing ovarian cancer risk. In this study, we show that MIA3G markedly improves the surgical selection for women presenting with adnexal masses. Methods: MIA3G employs seven serum biomarkers, patient age, and menopausal status. Serum samples were collected from 785 women (IQR: 39-55 years) across 12 centers that presented with adnexal masses. MIA3G risk scores were calculated for all subjects in this cohort. Physicians had no access to the MIA3G risk score when deciding upon a surgical referral. The performance of MIA3G for surgery referral was compared to clinical and surgical outcomes. MIA3G was also tested in an independent cohort comprising 29 women across 14 study sites, in which the physicians had access to and utilized MIA3G prior to surgical consideration. Results: When compared to the actual number of surgeries ( Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that MIA3G markedly augments the physician's decisions for surgical intervention and improves malignancy prediction in women presenting with adnexal masses. MIA3G utilization as a clinical diagnostic tool might help reduce unnecessary surgeries.

Indexed as

adnexal mass evaluationbenign ovarianconservative managementovarian cancer diagnosisovarian cancer surgeryovarian malignancypelvic mass

Identifiers

PMID38756943
PMCPMC11097110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.