ArticleMediterranean journal of rheumatology2024
Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Venous Thromboembolism with JAK Inhibitors versus TNF Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Mediterranean journal of rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Janus kinase inhibitor exposure and acute coronary event patterns in rheumatoid arthritis: a treatment-aware retrospective study.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Comparative safety of JAK inhibitors versus TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: a real-world propensity score-matched cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Article
- Emerging Targets in Psoriatic Arthritis: Dual IL-17A/F and Selective TYK2 Inhibition in a Clinical Perspective.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular safety and early myocardial deformation signal after upadacitinib initiation in immune-mediated inflammatory disorders.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
- Targeting the JAK/STAT pathway in atopic dermatitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Effects of Janus Kinase Inhibitors on Cardio-Vascular Risk in Rheumatic Diseases: A Prospective Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of treatment with janus kinase inhibitors on coronary microvascular perfusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational prospective cohort study.Rheumatology international · 2025Observational
- The Effects of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs on Cardiovascular Risk in Inflammatory Joint Diseases: Current Evidence and Uncertainties.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Review
- Post-marketing surveillance of upadacitinib: multilevel analysis of venous thromboembolism reporting in global data and rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Frailty and cardiovascular safety of JAK inhibitors versus TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world comparative study of drug effects and patient profiles.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and venous thromboembolic events (VTE) between tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: We researched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov until December of 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The outcomes studied were MACE (stroke, heart attack, myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death) and VTE (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism). We pooled data using random effects model. Risk for the reported outcomes was expressed as odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidential interval (CI). We performed a subgroup analysis based on study design. Results: We identified 23 studies, 20 of which compared the odds for MACE and 14 the odds for VTE between JAK and TNF inhibitors in RA patients. Ten studies were RCTs and the rest were observational. Regarding MACE risk we pooled data from a total of 215,278 patients (52,243 were treated with JAK inhibitors, while the rest 163,035 were under TNF inhibitors). Compared with TNF inhibitors, the OR for JAK inhibitors in regards with MACE risk was 0.87 (0.64-1.17, p<0.01). Regarding VTE, a total of 176,951 patients were analysed (41,375 JAK inhibitors users and 135,576 TNF inhibitors users). The OR for VTE for JAK inhibitors compared with TNF inhibitors was 1.28 (0.89-1.84, p<0.01). Conclusion: According to our results, there is no statistically significant difference for MACE or VTE in RA patients who receive either JAK or TNF inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.