Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38756718›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)

Recruiting a prospective community cohort to study Alzheimer's disease and structural and social determinants of health among adults racialized as Black: The ARCHES cohort.

Alexis I B Walker, Jean-Francois Trani, Christian F Banks, Samantha A Murphy, Wenqing Zha, Monique M Williams, Gregory S Day, Yiqi Zhu, Beau M Ances, Carl V Hill and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multimorbidity, Polypharmacy, and Neighborhood Disadvantage as Determinants of Cognitive Performance in the ARCHES Cohort.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexis I B WalkerDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Jean-Francois TraniBrown School Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis Missouri USA.
Christian F BanksDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Samantha A MurphyDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Wenqing ZhaDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Monique M WilliamsOak Street Health St. Louis Missouri USA.
Gregory S DayDepartment of Neurology Mayo Clinic in Florida Jacksonville Florida USA.
Yiqi ZhuSchool of Social Work Adelphi University Garden City New York USA.
Beau M AncesDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Carl V HillAlzheimer's Association Chicago Illinois USA.
Darrell L HudsonBrown School Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis Missouri USA.
Ganesh M BabulalDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.

Funding

The impact of bilingualism on cognitive reserve/resilience using socio-demographically and linguistically diverse populationsR01AG080469 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Suvarna Alladi, Ganesh M Babulal · 2023 to 2026
$4.0M
Aging Research Characterizing Health Exposome via Social drivers (ARCHES)R01AG074302 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BABULAL, GANESH M · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG074302NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis ongoing, prospective study examines the effectiveness of methods used to successfully recruit and retain 238 Black older adults in a longitudinal, observational Alzheimer's disease (AD) study.

methodsRecruitment strategies included traditional media, established research registries, speaking engagements, community events, and snowball sampling. Participants were asked to complete an annual office testing session, blood-based biomarker collection, optional one-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and community workshop.

resultsWithin the first 22 months of active recruitment, 629 individuals expressed interest in participating, and 238 enrolled in the ongoing study. Of the recruitment methods used, snowball sampling, community events, and speaking engagements were the most effective. DISCUSSION: The systemic underrepresentation of Black participants in AD research impacts the ability to generalize research findings and determine the effectiveness and safety of disease-modifying treatments. Research to slow, stop, or prevent AD remains a top priority but requires diversity in sample representation. Highlights: Provide flexible appointments in the evening or weekends, offering transportation assistance, and allowing participants to complete study visits at alternative locations, such as senior centers or community centers.Continuously monitor and analyze recruitment data to identify trends, challenges, and opportunities for improvement.Implement targeted strategies to recruit participants who are underrepresented based on sex, gender, or education to increase representation.Diversify the research team to include members who reflect the racial and cultural backgrounds of the target population, to enhance trust and rapport with prospective participants.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasedementiainclusionracesocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID38756718
PMCPMC11097001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.