Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38756631›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024

The exploration of surgery and survival prediction in patients with peritoneal metastasis from gastric adenocarcinoma based on the SEER database.

Yang Shen, Shuhong Yu, Yuefeng Zhang, Siyu Wang, Jiayu Chen, Yangtao Xu, Xinyao Hu, Jiayi Li, Shan Jiang, Ling Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yang Shen *Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Shuhong Yu *Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yuefeng Zhang *Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Siyu WangCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Jiayu ChenCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yangtao XuCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xinyao HuCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Jiayi LiCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Shan JiangCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Ling WangCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Le XuCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Zhuolin ZhouCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Junjian DengCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Biao ChenCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Ximing XuCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4240-5378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As one of the most common diseases in terms of cancer-related mortality worldwide, gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) frequently develops peritoneal metastases (PMs) in advanced stages. Systemic therapy or optimal supportive care are recommended for advanced GA; however, patients frequently develop drug resistance. Surgical resection is not recommended for stage IV patients, and there have been some controversies regarding the role of it in GA patients with PMs. The aim of the study was to preliminarily evaluate the possible effect of surgical treatments on patients with only PMs from GA. Methods: Data were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (year 2000-2022). A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the influence of selection bias and confounding variables on comparisons. Then Cox proportional hazard regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank test were performed to assess the efficacy of surgical treatment in patients with PMs from GA. Results: A total of 399 patients diagnosed with PMs from GA were enrolled for our analysis, of which, 180 (45.1%) patients did not receive surgery and 219 (54.9%) patients received surgery. Multivariate Cox regression analysis before PSM indicated higher rates of overall survival (OS) outcome for patients who had received surgery [hazard ratio (HR) =0.4342, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3283-0.5742, P<0.001]. After PSM, a total of 172 patients were enrolled, with 86 in each group. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that surgery was the independent factor reflecting patients' survival (HR =0.4382, 95% CI: 0.3037-0.6324, P<0.001). Subgroup survival analysis revealed that surgery may bring advantages to patients with grades I-IV, stages T1-T4, stage N0, and tumor size less than 71 mm (P<0.05). We also found that the OS of chemotherapy patients who had undergone surgery was better than that of chemotherapy patients who had not undergone surgery (P<0.01). Conclusions: Based on the SEER database, surgery has better OS for patients only with PMs from GA. Patients without lymph node metastasis and those who received chemotherapy before may benefit from surgery. These specific groups of patients may have surgery as an option to improve the prognosis.

Indexed as

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GA)peritoneal metastasis (PM)propensity score matching (PSM)surgerySurveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)

Identifiers

PMID38756631
PMCPMC11094495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.