ArticleHeliyon2024
Frontal and parietal cortices activation during walking is repeatable in older adults based on fNIRS.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Smartphone-Based IMU Turning Performance and Screening-Defined Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- The gait performance, sensorimotor cortical activation and their correlation during walking task among children with cerebral palsy: a fNIRS study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Exploration of brain function changes in the visual cortex of astigmatic subjects based on fNIRS.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- How aging impacts cortical dynamics and gait during dual-task turning revealed by fNIRS.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Altered cortical activation and functional connectivity during fixed phrase verbal fluency in children with autism spectrum disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Associations of different exercise modalities with balance performance and cortical hemodynamic responses in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the test-retest reliability of fNIRS in measuring frontal and parietal cortices activation during straight walking and turning walking in older adults, in order to provide a theoretical foundation for selecting assessment tools for clinical research on motor control and some diseases such as Parkinson's disease in older adults. Methods: 18 healthy older participants (69.1 ± 0.7 years) were included in this study. The participants completed straight walking and figure-of-eight turning walking tasks at self-selected speeds. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman scatter plots were used to assess the test-retest reliability of oxyhemoglobin (HbO Results: The test-retest reliability of HbO Conclusion: fNIRS can be used as a clinical measurement method to evaluate the brain activation of the older adults when walking in a straight line and turning, and the results are acceptable repeatability and consistency. However, it is necessary to strictly control the testing process and consider the possible changes in the repeated measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.