ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024
Has the fall of
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring State- and Individual-Level Characteristics Associated with Perceived Barriers to Accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Among Young Adult Black Women.Journal of sex research · 2026Article
- Anticipated Negative Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Among Young Adult Black Women in the US.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2026Article
- Increasing Contraceptive Access at Sites Serving Cross-State Abortion Patients: Results From the Southwest Contraceptive Access Network (SCAN) Intervention.American journal of public health · 2026Article
- Ethical complexities in contraceptive mandates for adolescent clinical trial participation: a qualitative analysis of U.S. adolescents' perspectives.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Training providers to improve access to emergency contraception in abortion ban states in the U.S.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Barriers and Needs for Postpartum Contraception.Maternal and child health journal · 2026Article
- Examining the Intersections Between Medical Mistrust, Discrimination, and Shared Decision-Making Among Racially Diverse Women in the US: Insights From the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Examining contraception-related discourse on social media after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision: a textual analysis of user-generated content on X (formerly Twitter).Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Advancing Equitable, Person-Centered Contraceptive Care Using Data-Driven Quality Improvement.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Over-the-Counter Oral Contraceptive Use and Initiation of Contraception.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Changes in Reproductive Health Information-Seeking Behaviors After the Dobbs Decision: Systematic Search of the Wikimedia Database.JMIR infodemiology · 2024Article
- Social media as health educator: An assessment of the understandability and accuracy of tiktok content about contraception.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2024Article
- "I am putting my fear on them subconsciously": a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the U.S.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Use of Preferred Source of Contraception Among Users of the Pill, Patch, and Ring in the US.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The overturning of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.