Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38756459›Full record

ArticleEducational and psychological measurement2024

Measuring Unipolar Traits With Continuous Response Items: Some Methodological and Substantive Developments.

Pere J Ferrando, Fabia Morales-Vives, Ana Hernández-Dorado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Educational and psychological measurement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pere J FerrandoUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3133-5466
Fabia Morales-VivesUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2095-0244
Ana Hernández-DoradoUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9502-9735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, some models for binary and graded format responses have been proposed to assess unipolar variables or "quasi-traits." These studies have mainly focused on clinical variables that have traditionally been treated as bipolar traits. In the present study, we have made a proposal for unipolar traits measured with continuous response items. The proposed log-logistic continuous unipolar model (LL-C) is remarkably simple and is more similar to the original binary formulation than the graded extensions, which is an advantage. Furthermore, considering that irrational, extreme, or polarizing beliefs could be another domain of unipolar variables, we have applied this proposal to an empirical example of superstitious beliefs. The results suggest that, in certain cases, the standard linear model can be a good approximation to the LL-C model in terms of parameter estimation and goodness of fit, but not trait estimates and their accuracy. The results also show the importance of considering the unipolar nature of this kind of trait when predicting criterion variables, since the validity results were clearly different.

Indexed as

continuous response formatcriterion validitylog-logistic unipolar modelsuperstitious beliefsunipolar traits

Identifiers

PMID38756459
PMCPMC11095320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.