Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38756414›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is safe and well tolerated by people living with MS - outcomes of the phase I randomised controlled trial (TAURUS).

Phuong Tram Nguyen, Amin Zarghami, Kalina Makowiecki, Natasha Stevens, Chigozie Ezegbe, Kain Kyle, Chenyu Wang, Linda Ly, Katie De La Rue, Mark R Hinder and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Chigozie EzegbeMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Kain KyleSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre (SNAC), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Chenyu WangSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre (SNAC), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Linda LySydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre (SNAC), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Katie De La RueMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Mark R HinderSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Lewis JohnsonMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Jennifer RodgerSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Samantha CooperRoyal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Carlie L CullenMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6929-6258
Michael BarnettSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre (SNAC), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-8864
Kaylene M YoungMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-3463
Bruce V TaylorMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), delivered as a daily intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) for four consecutive weeks, increased the number of new oligodendrocytes in the adult mouse brain. Therefore, rTMS holds potential as a remyelinating intervention for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: Primarily to determine the safety and tolerability of our rTMS protocol in people with MS. Secondary objectives include feasibility, blinding and an exploration of changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and cognitive or motor performance. Methods: A randomised (2:1), placebo controlled, single blind, parallel group, phase 1 trial of 20 rTMS sessions (600 iTBS pulses per hemisphere; 25% maximum stimulator output), delivered over 4-5 weeks. Twenty participants were randomly assigned to 'sham' ( Results: Five adverse events (AEs) including one serious AE reported. None were related to treatment. Protocol compliance was high (85%) and blinding successful. Within participant MRI metrics, PROMs and cognitive or motor performance were unchanged over time. Conclusion: Twenty sessions of rTMS is safe and well tolerated in a small group of people with MS. The study protocol and procedures are feasible. Improvement of sham is warranted before further investigating safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

MRImultiple sclerosisRCTremyelinationrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationsafety

Identifiers

PMID38756414
PMCPMC11097717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.