Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38756396›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024

Programmatic quality measures: a new model to promote surgical quality.

Xane Peters, Jill Sage, Courtney Collins, Frank Opelka, Clifford Ko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xane PetersDivision of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9079-1614
Jill SageDivision of Advocacy and Health Policy, American College of Surgeons, Washington, DC 20001, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7827-0296
Courtney CollinsDivision of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6967-2882
Frank OpelkaDivision of Advocacy and Health Policy, American College of Surgeons, Washington, DC 20001, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-3960
Clifford KoDivision of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care performance metrics are offered predominantly in terms of outcomes, processes, or structural components of health care delivery. However, measurement is limited by variability in data sources, definitions, and workarounds. The American College of Surgeons has recently developed a new type of performance metric known as a "programmatic measure". These metrics align structures, processes, and outcomes to better coordinate quality measurement with support of frontline care teams. In this multifaceted way, these measures differ from current "single" measures such as targeting surgical site infection. The thematic focus of these measures and alignment of structure-resource components to support processes and outcomes also sets these measures apart from contemporary composite measures. Importantly, structural elements of these measures reflect minimum resources required for patient care, addressing staffing and resource barriers felt by local institutions in addressing numerous existing quality metrics. These metrics will streamline quality reporting to improve care navigation for patients. Clinicians will find more appropriately aligned goals and responsibilities, resulting in increased teamwork and communication. These measures are designed to address the current burdens of overabundant metrics, priority misalignment, and low resources in a patient-centric fashion to better align health care quality and measurement.

Indexed as

programmatic measurequality metricsurgical quality

Identifiers

PMID38756396
PMCPMC10986278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.