Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38756359›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2023

Pivot: partisan policy responses to COVID-19 health disparities.

Melissa S Creary, Scott L Greer, Sydney Kitzmiller, Phillip M Singer, Naquia A Unwala, Soha Vaziri, Charley E Willison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melissa S CrearyDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Scott L GreerDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-0471
Sydney KitzmillerDepartment of Political Science, University of Utah, 260 South Central Campus Drive Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3648-8407
Phillip M SingerDepartment of Political Science, University of Utah, 260 South Central Campus Drive Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States.
Naquia A UnwalaDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3898-2378
Soha VaziriDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9980-7116
Charley E WillisonDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7272-1080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How did partisanship influence rhetoric about, public opinion of, and policies that prioritize racial and ethnic health disparities of COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic between March and July 2020? In this retrospective, mixed-methods analysis using national administrative and survey data, we found that the rhetoric and policy of shared sacrifice diminished and partisan differences in pandemic policy increased once it became clear to political elites that there were major racial disparities in COVID-19 cases and deaths. We trace how first disparities emerged in data and then were reported in elite, national media, discussed in Congress, and reflected in public opinion. Once racial disparities were apparent, partisan divides opened in media, public opinion, and legislative activity, with Democrats foregrounding inequality and Republicans increasingly downplaying the pandemic. This temporal dimension, focusing on how the diffusion of awareness of inequalities among elites shaped policy in the crucial months of early 2020, is the principal novel finding of our analysis. Overall, there is a clear, partisan policy response to addressing COVID-19 racial disparities across media, public opinion, subnational legislative activity, and congressional deliberations.

Indexed as

COVID-19health disparitiespandemic policy and politicsracialization

Identifiers

PMID38756359
PMCPMC10986205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.